Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31037468›Full record

ArticleChromosoma2019

Increased levels of superoxide dismutase suppress meiotic segregation errors in aging oocytes.

Adrienne T Perkins, Miranda M Greig, Amrita A Sontakke, Andrew S Peloquin, Mark A McPeek, Sharon E Bickel

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chromosoma, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. A Brief History ofGenes · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Aristolochic acid I exposure decreases oocyte quality.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Anti-Aging Effect of Urolithin A on Bovine OocytesAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Adrienne T PerkinsDepartment of Biological Sciences, Dartmouth College, 78 College Street, Hanover, NH, 03755, USA.
Miranda M GreigDepartment of Biological Sciences, Dartmouth College, 78 College Street, Hanover, NH, 03755, USA.
Amrita A SontakkeDepartment of Biological Sciences, Dartmouth College, 78 College Street, Hanover, NH, 03755, USA.
Andrew S PeloquinDepartment of Biological Sciences, Dartmouth College, 78 College Street, Hanover, NH, 03755, USA.
Mark A McPeekDepartment of Biological Sciences, Dartmouth College, 78 College Street, Hanover, NH, 03755, USA.
Sharon E BickelDepartment of Biological Sciences, Dartmouth College, 78 College Street, Hanover, NH, 03755, USA. sharon.e.bickel@dartmouth.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-3912-6500
Dartmouth College · US

Funding

Resource Component: Acquisition, maintenance and distribution of Drosophila stocksP40OD018537 · OD · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI Annette L. Parks · 2014 to 2026
$13.5M
DROSOPHILA GENOMICS RESOURCE CENTERP40OD010949 · OD · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI Andrew Zelhof · 2012 to 2026
$9.4M
Regulation of Sister-Chromatid Cohesion in MeiosisR01GM059354 · NIGMS · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI BICKEL, SHARON ELIZABETH · 2000 to 2024
$6.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM059354NIH HHS P40 OD010949NIH HHS P40 OD018537
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The risk of meiotic segregation errors increases dramatically during a woman's thirties, a phenomenon known as the maternal age effect. In addition, several lines of evidence indicate that meiotic cohesion deteriorates as oocytes age. One mechanism that may contribute to age-induced loss of cohesion is oxidative damage. In support of this model, we recently reported (Perkins et al. in Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113(44):E6823-E6830, 2016) that the knockdown of the reactive oxygen species (ROS)-scavenging enzyme, superoxide dismutase (SOD), during meiotic prophase causes premature loss of arm cohesion and segregation errors in Drosophila oocytes. If age-dependent oxidative damage causes meiotic segregation errors, then the expression of extra SOD1 (cytosolic/nuclear) or SOD2 (mitochondrial) in oocytes may attenuate this effect. To test this hypothesis, we generated flies that contain a UAS-controlled EMPTY, SOD1, or SOD2 cassette and induced expression using a Gal4 driver that turns on during meiotic prophase. We then compared the fidelity of chromosome segregation in aged and non-aged Drosophila oocytes for all three genotypes. As expected, p{EMPTY} oocytes subjected to aging exhibited a significant increase in nondisjunction (NDJ) compared with non-aged oocytes. In contrast, the magnitude of age-dependent NDJ was significantly reduced when expression of extra SOD1 or SOD2 was induced during prophase. Our findings support the hypothesis that a major factor underlying the maternal age effect in humans is age-induced oxidative damage that results in premature loss of meiotic cohesion. Moreover, our work raises the exciting possibility that antioxidant supplementation may provide a preventative strategy to reduce the risk of meiotic segregation errors in older women.

Indexed as

Chromosome SegregationMaternal AgeMeiosisAnimalsCellular SenescenceDrosophilaFemaleGene ExpressionGenes, ReporterNondisjunction, GeneticOocytesOxidative StressSuperoxide DismutaseSuperoxide DismutaseChromosome segregationMaternal age effectMeiosisOxidative damageReactive oxygen species (ROS)Sister chromatid cohesion

Identifiers

PMID31037468
PMCPMC6823651
OpenAlexW2942979752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.