ReviewOperative Orthopadie und Traumatologie2019
[The periosteal flap augmentation technique in chronic lateral ankle instability].
Review in Operative Orthopadie und Traumatologie, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Feasibility of acromial periosteal flap technique for enhanced reconstruction of acromioclavicular joint dislocations: a cadaveric study.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Article
- Postural stability after operative reconstruction of the AFTL in chronic ankle instability comparing three different surgical techniques.Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland) · 2024Article
- Lateral ligament reconstruction and additive medial ligament reconstruction in chronic ankle instability: a retrospective study.Orthopedic reviews · 2024Article
- Arthroscopic modified Broström operation versus open reconstruction with local periosteal flap in chronic ankle instability.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2022Article
- Effect of Periosteal Flap Augmentation on Outcomes of Modified Broström-Gould Procedure for Chronic Lateral Ankle Instability.Foot & ankle orthopaedics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveAnatomic repair of the lateral ligament complex of the ankle joint and augmentation with an autologous pedicled periosteal flap of the distal fibula following identification and concomitant treatment of intra-articular pathologies. INDICATIONS: Symptomatic chronic mechanical lateral ankle instability. As a modular step in the treatment of osteochondral lesions in conjunction with lateral ankle instability. CONTRAINDICATIONS: Higher degree osteoarthritis of the ankle joint (>Kellgren/Lawrence 2 and 4 or Outerbridge 3 and 4) and/or hindfoot deformity; mechanical incompetence of both the fibulotalar anterior ligament and the fibulocalcaneal ligament preventing anatomical reinsertion; general risk factors. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Diagnostic arthroscopy for identification and treatment of intraarticular pathologies; verification and grading of ligamentous instability (medial, lateral, combined). Open exposure of the distal fibula and the ruptured components of the lateral ankle ligament complex. Anatomic reinsertion of the original ligaments and assessment of their mechanical competence. Apart from the situation in the juvenile patient with a thick periosteal layer a doubled and pedicled periosteal strip of the distal fibular periosteum will suffice for the augmentation in one ligamentous component, only. Fixation in the talus or calcaneus is achieved via suture anchors, screws with a washer or transosseous fixation via interference screw. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Postoperative immobilization in a lower leg split cast or a splint until wound healing (5-8 days), mobilization in a walker or an ankle orthosis with consecutive full weight-bearing for further 4-5 weeks. Proprioceptive and pronator muscle training, optionally insole or lateral wedge at the shoe sole for 6 months postoperatively. Avoidance of contact sports for 4-6 months.
resultsSeveral studies have reported reliable restoration of ligamentous ankle stability with overall success rates >90% and good to excellent total results in >90% of patients with limited minor complications. In view of the heterogeneous data from previous studies, some recent studies have demonstrated that the outcome after periosteal augmentation is comparable to that after techniques employing free tendon graft for anatomic restoration of ligamentous ankle stability. The technique has been applied successfully in cases of poor mechanical properties of the formerly ruptured ligaments and in patients with a high functional demand.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.