Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31037293›Full record

Observational studyDiseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus2019

Volumetric laser endomicroscopy and its application to Barrett's esophagus: results from a 1,000 patient registry.

M S Smith, B Cash, V Konda, A J Trindade, S Gordon, S DeMeester, V Joshi, D Diehl, E Ganguly, H Mashimo and 38 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02215291 (High Resolution Optical Imaging of the Esophagus Using the NvisionVLE™ Imaging Registry), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02215291 completednot on this map

High Resolution Optical Imaging of the Esophagus Using the NvisionVLE™ Imaging Registry

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorNinePoint MedicalRan2014 to 2018Enrolled1,000ConditionsEsophagogastroduodenoscopy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Improving esophageal cancer screening across the globe: Translating knowledge into action.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Volumetric laser endomicroscopy in Barrett's esophagus: ready for primetime.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2020
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

48 authors at 20 institutions in 1 country.

M S SmithMount Sinai West & Mount Sinai St. Luke's Hospitals, New York, New York.
B CashUniversity of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas.
V KondaBaylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
A J TrindadeZucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Northwell Health System Manhasset, New York.
S GordonDartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire.
S DeMeesterThe Oregon Clinic, Portland, Oregon.
V JoshiUniversity Medical Center at LSU, New Orleans, Louisiana.
D DiehlGeisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania.
E GangulyUniversity of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, Vermont.
H MashimoVA Boston Health Care System, Boston, Massachusetts.
S SinghVA Boston Health Care System, Boston, Massachusetts.
B JobeAllegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
M McKinleyZucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Northwell Health System Manhasset, New York.
M WallaceMayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida.
Y KomatsuAllegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
S ThakkarAllegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
F Schnoll-SussmanWeill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
R SharaihaWeill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
M KahalehRobert Wood Johnson University Hospital, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
P TarnaskyMethodist Health System, Dallas, Texas.
H WolfsenMayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida.
R HawesFlorida Hospital, Orlando, Florida.
J LiphamUniversity of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California.
H KharaGeisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania.
D PleskowBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
U NavaneethanFlorida Hospital, Orlando, Florida.
P KediaMethodist Health System, Dallas, Texas.
M HasanFlorida Hospital, Orlando, Florida.
A SethiColumbia University Medical Center, New York, New York.
J SamarasenaUC Irvine Medical Center, Irvine, California.
U D SiddiquiChicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
F GressColumbia University Medical Center, New York, New York.
R RodriguezUniversity of South Alabama, Mobile, Alabama.
C LeeZucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Northwell Health System Manhasset, New York.
T GondaColumbia University Medical Center, New York, New York.
I WaxmanChicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
S HyderDartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire.
J PonerosColumbia University Medical Center, New York, New York.
K SharzehiLewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
J A Di PalmaUniversity of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas.
D V SejpalZucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Northwell Health System Manhasset, New York.
D OhUniversity of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California.
J HagenUniversity of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California.
R RothsteinDartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire.
M SawhneyBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
T BerzinBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Z MalikLewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
K ChangUC Irvine Medical Center, Irvine, California.
Columbia University Irving Medical Center · USNorthwell Health · USAdventHealth Orlando · USAllegheny Health Network · USBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USDartmouth–Hitchcock Medical Center · USUniversity of Southern California · USCornell University · USGeisinger Medical Center · USJacksonville College · USMethodist Dallas Medical Center · USTemple University · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · USUniversity of California, Irvine · USVA Boston Healthcare System · USBaylor University Medical Center · USOregon Clinic · USRobert Wood Johnson University Hospital · USSt. Luke's Hospital · USUniversity Medical Center New Orleans · US

Funding

BLRD VA I01 BX004455CSRD VA I01 CX000347CSRD VA I01 CX001146
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Volumetric laser endomicroscopy (VLE) uses optical coherence tomography (OCT) for real-time, microscopic cross-sectional imaging. A US-based multi-center registry was constructed to prospectively collect data on patients undergoing upper endoscopy during which a VLE scan was performed. The objective of this registry was to determine usage patterns of VLE in clinical practice and to estimate quantitative and qualitative performance metrics as they are applied to Barrett's esophagus (BE) management. All procedures utilized the NvisionVLE Imaging System (NinePoint Medical, Bedford, MA) which was used by investigators to identify the tissue types present, along with focal areas of concern. Following the VLE procedure, investigators were asked to answer six key questions regarding how VLE impacted each case. Statistical analyses including neoplasia diagnostic yield improvement using VLE was performed. One thousand patients were enrolled across 18 US trial sites from August 2014 through April 2016. In patients with previously diagnosed or suspected BE (894/1000), investigators used VLE and identified areas of concern not seen on white light endoscopy (WLE) in 59% of the procedures. VLE imaging also guided tissue acquisition and treatment in 71% and 54% of procedures, respectively. VLE as an adjunct modality improved the neoplasia diagnostic yield by 55% beyond the standard of care practice. In patients with no prior history of therapy, and without visual findings from other technologies, VLE-guided tissue acquisition increased neoplasia detection over random biopsies by 700%. Registry investigators reported that VLE improved the BE management process when used as an adjunct tissue acquisition and treatment guidance tool. The ability of VLE to image large segments of the esophagus with microscopic cross-sectional detail may provide additional benefits including higher yield biopsies and more efficient tissue acquisition. Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02215291.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBarrett EsophagusBiopsyClinical Decision-MakingComputer SystemsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPractice Patterns, Physicians'Prospective StudiesRegistriesTomography, Optical CoherenceUnited StatesBarrett's esophagusdysplasiaendomicroscopyimaging

Identifiers

PMID31037293
PMCPMC6853704
OpenAlexW2943340856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.