Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31037247›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2019

Impact of JPEG 2000 compression on deep convolutional neural networks for metastatic cancer detection in histopathological images.

Farhad Ghazvinian Zanjani, Svitlana Zinger, Bastian Piepers, Saeed Mahmoudpour, Peter Schelkens, Peter H N de With

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Tissue Contamination Challenges the Credibility of Machine Learning Models in Real World Digital Pathology.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Quality control stress test for deep learning-based diagnostic model in digital pathology.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Farhad Ghazvinian ZanjaniEindhoven University of Technology, SPS-VCA, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9625-5563
Svitlana ZingerEindhoven University of Technology, SPS-VCA, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Bastian PiepersBarco NV, Healthcare Division, Kortrijk, Belgium.
Saeed MahmoudpourVrije Universiteit Brussel, Department of Electronics and Informatics, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1006-1838
Peter SchelkensVrije Universiteit Brussel, Department of Electronics and Informatics, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0908-1655
Peter H N de WithEindhoven University of Technology, SPS-VCA, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The availability of massive amounts of data in histopathological whole-slide images (WSIs) has enabled the application of deep learning models and especially convolutional neural networks (CNNs), which have shown a high potential for improvement in cancer diagnosis. However, storage and transmission of large amounts of data such as gigapixel histopathological WSIs are challenging. Exploiting lossy compression algorithms for medical images is controversial but, as long as the clinical diagnosis is not affected, is acceptable. We study the impact of JPEG 2000 compression on our proposed CNN-based algorithm, which has produced performance comparable to that of pathologists and which was ranked second place in the CAMELYON17 challenge. Detecting tumor metastases in hematoxylin and eosin-stained tissue sections of breast lymph nodes is evaluated and compared with the pathologists' diagnoses in three different experimental setups. Our experiments show that the CNN model is robust against compression ratios up to 24:1 when it is trained on uncompressed high-quality images. We demonstrate that a model trained on lower quality images-i.e., lossy compressed images-depicts a classification performance that is significantly improved for the corresponding compression ratio. Moreover, it is also observed that the model performs equally well on all higher-quality images. These properties will help to design cloud-based computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) systems, e.g., telemedicine that employ deep CNN models that are more robust to image quality variations due to compression required to address data storage and transmission constraints. However, the results presented are specific to the CAD system and application described, and further work is needed to examine whether they generalize to other systems and applications.

Indexed as

convolutional neural networksdigital pathologyimage qualityJPEG 2000 compressiontumor detection

Identifiers

PMID31037247
PMCPMC6479230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.