Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31037068›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2019

Living at the Extremes: Extremophiles and the Limits of Life in a Planetary Context.

Nancy Merino, Heidi S Aronson, Diana P Bojanova, Jayme Feyhl-Buska, Michael L Wong, Shu Zhang, Donato Giovannelli

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 225 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
225citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

225 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Genetic Detection ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

165 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nancy MerinoDepartment of Earth Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Heidi S AronsonDepartment of Biology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Diana P BojanovaDepartment of Earth Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Jayme Feyhl-BuskaDepartment of Earth Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Michael L WongDepartment of Astronomy - Astrobiology Program, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Shu ZhangSection of Infection and Immunity, Herman Ostrow School of Dentistry of USC, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Donato GiovannelliEarth-Life Science Institute, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

Shared Services Center NASA 80NSSC18M0093
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prokaryotic life has dominated most of the evolutionary history of our planet, evolving to occupy virtually all available environmental niches. Extremophiles, especially those thriving under multiple extremes, represent a key area of research for multiple disciplines, spanning from the study of adaptations to harsh conditions, to the biogeochemical cycling of elements. Extremophile research also has implications for origin of life studies and the search for life on other planetary and celestial bodies. In this article, we will review the current state of knowledge for the biospace in which life operates on Earth and will discuss it in a planetary context, highlighting knowledge gaps and areas of opportunity.

Indexed as

astrobiologyextremophiles/extremophilyhabitability and astrobiologylimits of lifepolyextremophilessearch for life

Identifiers

PMID31037068
PMCPMC6476344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.