Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31036993›Full record

ReviewSeminars in hearing2019

Otoprotectants: From Research to Clinical Application.

Colleen G Le Prell

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in hearing, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Pharmacotherapy of Tinnitus.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Colleen G Le PrellSchool of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas.
The University of Texas at Dallas · US

Funding

Micronutrient intervention to reduce noise-induced hearing lossU01DC008423 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MILLER, JOSEF MAYER · 2008 to 2011
$3.0M
NIDCD NIH HHS U01 DC008423
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is an urgent need for otoprotective drug agents. Prevention of noise-induced hearing loss continues to be a major challenge for military personnel and workers in a variety of industries despite the requirements that at-risk individuals use hearing protection devices such as ear plugs or ear muffs. Drug-induced hearing loss is also a major quality-of-life issue with many patients experiencing clinically significant hearing loss as a side effect of treatment with life-saving drug agents such as cisplatin and aminoglycoside antibiotics. There are no pharmaceutical agents approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for the purpose of protecting the inner ear against damage, and preventing associated hearing loss (otoprotection). However, a variety of preclinical studies have suggested promise, with some supporting data from clinical trials now being available as well. Additional research within this promising area is urgently needed.

Indexed as

drug-induced hearing lossnoise-induced hearing lossotoprotectionototoxicity

Identifiers

PMID31036993
PMCPMC6486371
OpenAlexW2940590313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.