ArticleScientific reports2019
Characterisation of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide in dialysis patients and its reduced prognostic significance in the elderly.
Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Impact of Volume Removal by Hemodialysis on Elevated NT-proBNP Levels in Patients With Hypervolemia.Cureus · 2025Article
- Clinical influencing factors affecting pulmonary hypertension in hemodialysis patients.Kidney research and clinical practice · 2025Article
- NT-pro BNP level at dialysis initiation is a useful biomarker for predicting hospitalization for ischemic heart disease.Clinical and experimental nephrology · 2024Article
- Association Between NT-proBNP and Prolonged Length of Stay in Hospital Among Preterm Infants Born at 28-31 Weeks' Gestation.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2021Article
- Pathophysiology, Clinical Characteristics of Diabetic Cardiomyopathy: Therapeutic Potential of Natural Polyphenols.Frontiers in nutrition · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Characterisation of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) in chronic haemodialysis patients and its prognostic significance in age stratification have not been addressed. A prospective cohort study with cross-sectional analyses at baseline was performed. Outcomes were all-cause mortality, non-malignancy-related mortality, and cardiovascular disease (CVD)-related mortality. NT-proBNP was significantly higher in elderly, female, and low dry weight patients. Study patients were divided into two groups: Group-O (≥75 years) and Group-Y (<75 years). The 7-year follow-up receiver operating curve analysis showed that NT-proBNP significantly predicted all outcomes. All-cause mortality cut-off points were significantly different among the groups (total cohort, 5375 pg/mL; Group-Y, 3682 pg/mL; Group-O, 11750 pg/mL). Cox regression analysis showed risks for all outcomes by tertile NT-proBNP significantly higher in the total cohort and Group-Y as adjusted by potential confounders. For all-cause mortality, hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were T2 1.70 (0.89 to 3.25), p = 0.11, T3 2.95 (1.54 to 5.67), p < 0.01 in Group-Y; and T2 1.00 (0.64 to 1.58), p = 1.00; T3 1.50 (0.94 to 2.40), p = 0.09 in Group-O. In conclusion, NT-proBNP was significantly higher in elderly, female, and low dry weight chronic dialysis patients. NT-proBNP was significantly associated with all outcomes. However, this association was reduced in elderly patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.