Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31036867›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Genetic risk score has added value over initial clinical grading stage in predicting disease progression in age-related macular degeneration.

Thomas J Heesterbeek, Eiko K de Jong, Ilhan E Acar, Joannes M M Groenewoud, Bart Liefers, Clara I Sánchez, Tunde Peto, Carel B Hoyng, Daniel Pauleikhoff, Hans W Hense and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Evaluating the impact of modeling choices on the performance of integrated genetic and clinical models.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Risk factors for progression of age-related macular degeneration.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Thomas J HeesterbeekDepartment of Ophthalmology, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3232-2587
Eiko K de JongDepartment of Ophthalmology, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Ilhan E AcarDepartment of Ophthalmology, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Joannes M M GroenewoudDepartment of Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Bart LiefersDepartment of Ophthalmology, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Clara I SánchezDepartment of Ophthalmology, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Tunde PetoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Queens University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6265-0381
Carel B HoyngDepartment of Ophthalmology, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Daniel PauleikhoffDepartment of Ophthalmology, St. Franziskus Hospital, Münster, Germany.
Hans W HenseInstitute of Epidemiology and Social Medicine, Westfälische Wilhelms University, Münster, Germany.
Anneke I den HollanderDepartment of Ophthalmology, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Anneke.denHollander@radboudumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0634-5408
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLQueen's University Belfast · GBSt. Franziskus Hospital · DEUniversity of Münster · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several prediction models for progression of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) have been developed, but the added value of using genetic information in those models in addition to clinical characteristics is ambiguous. In this prospective cohort study, we explored the added value of genetics using a genetic risk score (GRS) based on 52 AMD-associated variants, in addition to the clinical severity grading at baseline as quantified by validated drusen detection software, to predict disease progression in 177 AMD patients after 6.5 years follow-up. The GRS was strongly associated with the drusen coverage at baseline (P < 0.001) and both the GRS and drusen coverage were associated with disease progression. When the GRS was added as predictor in addition to the drusen coverage, R

Indexed as

AgedChoroidal NeovascularizationDisease ProgressionFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGeographic AtrophyHumansMacular DegenerationMaleProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID31036867
PMCPMC6488669
OpenAlexW2941365584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.