Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31036636›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2019

Tinbergen's challenge for the neuroscience of behavior.

Donald Pfaff, Inna Tabansky, Wulf Haubensak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Evolutionary psychiatry: foundations, progress and challenges.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2023
    Article
  3. Stressed rats fail to exhibit avoidance reactions to innately aversive social calls.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2022
    Article
  4. Systems Neuroscience of Natural Behaviors in Rodents.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Review
  5. The Creative Neurons.Frontiers in psychology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Donald PfaffLaboratory of Neurobiology and Behavior, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY 10065; pfaff@rockefeller.edu.
Inna TabanskyLaboratory of Neurobiology and Behavior, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY 10065.
Wulf HaubensakResearch Institute of Molecular Pathology, Vienna Biocenter, 1030 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-2034-9184

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nobel laureate Nikolaas Tinbergen provided clear criteria for declaring a neuroscience problem solved, criteria which despite the passage of more than 50 years and vastly expanded neuroscience tool kits remain applicable today. Tinbergen said for neuroscientists to claim that a behavior is understood, they must correspondingly understand its (

Indexed as

NeurosciencesAnimalsFamous PersonsMaternal BehaviorSexual Behavior, Animalamygdalabehaviorhypothalamusparentalsex

Identifiers

PMID31036636
PMCPMC6525541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.