Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31036631›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2019

Influenza A virus mimetic nanoparticles trigger selective cell uptake.

Sara Maslanka Figueroa, Anika Veser, Kathrin Abstiens, Daniel Fleischmann, Sebastian Beck, Achim Goepferich

Open access · bronzeAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Current Strategies and Potential Prospects for Nanoparticle-Mediated Treatment of Diabetic Nephropathy.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2022
    Review
  6. Current trends in diagnosis and treatment strategies of COVID-19 infection.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Biomedical nanoparticle design: What we can learn from viruses.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2021
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sara Maslanka FigueroaDepartment of Pharmaceutical Technology, University of Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.
Anika VeserDepartment of Pharmaceutical Technology, University of Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.
Kathrin AbstiensDepartment of Pharmaceutical Technology, University of Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.
Daniel FleischmannDepartment of Pharmaceutical Technology, University of Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.
Sebastian BeckDepartment of Pharmaceutical Technology, University of Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.
Achim GoepferichDepartment of Pharmaceutical Technology, University of Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany achim.goepferich@ur.de.
University of Regensburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Poor target cell specificity is currently a major shortcoming of nanoparticles (NPs) used for biomedical applications. It causes significant material loss to off-target sites and poor availability at the intended delivery site. To overcome this limitation, we designed particles that identify cells in a virus-like manner. As a blueprint, we chose a mechanism typical of influenza A virus particles in which ectoenzymatic hemagglutinin activation by target cells is a mandatory prerequisite for binding to a secondary target structure that finally confirms cell identity and allows for uptake of the virus. We developed NPs that probe mesangial cells for the presence of angiotensin-converting enzyme on their surface using angiotensin I (Ang-I) as a proligand. This initial interaction enzymatically transforms Ang-I to a secondary ligand angiotensin II (Ang-II) that has the potential to bind in a second stage to Ang-II type-1 receptor (AT1R). The presence of the receptor confirms the target cell identity and triggers NP uptake via endocytosis. Our virus-mimetic NPs showed outstanding target-cell affinity with picomolar avidities and were able to selectively identify these cells in the presence of 90% off-target cells that carried only the AT1R. Our results demonstrate that the design of virus-mimetic cell interactive NPs is a valuable strategy to enhance NP specificity for therapeutic and diagnostic applications. Our set of primary and secondary targets is particularly suited for the identification of mesangial cells that play a pivotal role in diabetic nephropathy, one of the leading causes of renal failure, for which currently no treatment exists.

Indexed as

Drug Delivery SystemsAngiotensin IInfluenza A virusMesangial CellsNanoparticlesAngiotensin Ienzyme responsiveheteromultivalentinfluenza Atarget specificvirus-mimetic nanoparticles

Identifiers

PMID31036631
PMCPMC6525500
OpenAlexW2943785966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.