Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31036608›Full record

ArticleCMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne2019

Opioid agonist treatment dosage and patient-perceived dosage adequacy, and risk of hepatitis C infection among people who inject drugs.

Andreea A Artenie, Nanor Minoyan, Brendan Jacka, Stine Høj, Didier Jutras-Aswad, Élise Roy, Lise Gauvin, Geng Zang, Julie Bruneau

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Hepatitis C Virus Reinfection Rate Among Persons Who Use Drugs and Are Maintained on Medication Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2020
    Article
  14. The authors respond to "Opioid agonist dosage adequacy from clinical and patient perspectives: further considerations".CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2019
    Article
  15. Opioid agonist dosage adequacy from clinical and patient perspectives: further considerations.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2019
    Article
  16. Patient-centred care in opioid agonist treatment could improve outcomes.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2019
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Andreea A ArtenieDepartment of Social and Preventive Medicine (Artenie, Minoyan, Gauvin), School of Public Health, Université de Montréal; Research Centre (Artenie, Minoyan, Jacka, Høj, Jutras-Aswad, Gauvin, Zang, Bruneau), Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal; Department of Psychiatry (Jutras-Aswad), Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Addiction Studies and Research Program (Roy), Université de Sherbrooke, Longueuil, Que.; Institut national de santé publique du Québec (Roy); Department of Family and Emergency Medicine (Bruneau), Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.
Nanor MinoyanDepartment of Social and Preventive Medicine (Artenie, Minoyan, Gauvin), School of Public Health, Université de Montréal; Research Centre (Artenie, Minoyan, Jacka, Høj, Jutras-Aswad, Gauvin, Zang, Bruneau), Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal; Department of Psychiatry (Jutras-Aswad), Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Addiction Studies and Research Program (Roy), Université de Sherbrooke, Longueuil, Que.; Institut national de santé publique du Québec (Roy); Department of Family and Emergency Medicine (Bruneau), Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.
Brendan JackaDepartment of Social and Preventive Medicine (Artenie, Minoyan, Gauvin), School of Public Health, Université de Montréal; Research Centre (Artenie, Minoyan, Jacka, Høj, Jutras-Aswad, Gauvin, Zang, Bruneau), Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal; Department of Psychiatry (Jutras-Aswad), Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Addiction Studies and Research Program (Roy), Université de Sherbrooke, Longueuil, Que.; Institut national de santé publique du Québec (Roy); Department of Family and Emergency Medicine (Bruneau), Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.
Stine HøjDepartment of Social and Preventive Medicine (Artenie, Minoyan, Gauvin), School of Public Health, Université de Montréal; Research Centre (Artenie, Minoyan, Jacka, Høj, Jutras-Aswad, Gauvin, Zang, Bruneau), Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal; Department of Psychiatry (Jutras-Aswad), Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Addiction Studies and Research Program (Roy), Université de Sherbrooke, Longueuil, Que.; Institut national de santé publique du Québec (Roy); Department of Family and Emergency Medicine (Bruneau), Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.
Didier Jutras-AswadDepartment of Social and Preventive Medicine (Artenie, Minoyan, Gauvin), School of Public Health, Université de Montréal; Research Centre (Artenie, Minoyan, Jacka, Høj, Jutras-Aswad, Gauvin, Zang, Bruneau), Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal; Department of Psychiatry (Jutras-Aswad), Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Addiction Studies and Research Program (Roy), Université de Sherbrooke, Longueuil, Que.; Institut national de santé publique du Québec (Roy); Department of Family and Emergency Medicine (Bruneau), Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.
Élise RoyDepartment of Social and Preventive Medicine (Artenie, Minoyan, Gauvin), School of Public Health, Université de Montréal; Research Centre (Artenie, Minoyan, Jacka, Høj, Jutras-Aswad, Gauvin, Zang, Bruneau), Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal; Department of Psychiatry (Jutras-Aswad), Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Addiction Studies and Research Program (Roy), Université de Sherbrooke, Longueuil, Que.; Institut national de santé publique du Québec (Roy); Department of Family and Emergency Medicine (Bruneau), Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.
Lise GauvinDepartment of Social and Preventive Medicine (Artenie, Minoyan, Gauvin), School of Public Health, Université de Montréal; Research Centre (Artenie, Minoyan, Jacka, Høj, Jutras-Aswad, Gauvin, Zang, Bruneau), Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal; Department of Psychiatry (Jutras-Aswad), Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Addiction Studies and Research Program (Roy), Université de Sherbrooke, Longueuil, Que.; Institut national de santé publique du Québec (Roy); Department of Family and Emergency Medicine (Bruneau), Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.
Geng ZangDepartment of Social and Preventive Medicine (Artenie, Minoyan, Gauvin), School of Public Health, Université de Montréal; Research Centre (Artenie, Minoyan, Jacka, Høj, Jutras-Aswad, Gauvin, Zang, Bruneau), Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal; Department of Psychiatry (Jutras-Aswad), Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Addiction Studies and Research Program (Roy), Université de Sherbrooke, Longueuil, Que.; Institut national de santé publique du Québec (Roy); Department of Family and Emergency Medicine (Bruneau), Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.
Julie BruneauDepartment of Social and Preventive Medicine (Artenie, Minoyan, Gauvin), School of Public Health, Université de Montréal; Research Centre (Artenie, Minoyan, Jacka, Høj, Jutras-Aswad, Gauvin, Zang, Bruneau), Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal; Department of Psychiatry (Jutras-Aswad), Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Addiction Studies and Research Program (Roy), Université de Sherbrooke, Longueuil, Que.; Institut national de santé publique du Québec (Roy); Department of Family and Emergency Medicine (Bruneau), Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que. julie.bruneau@umontreal.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOpioid agonist treatment is considered important in preventing acquisition of hepatitis C virus (HCV) among people who inject drugs; however, the role of dosage in opioid agonist treatment is unclear. We investigated the joint association of prescribed dosage of opioid agonist treatment and patient-perceived dosage adequacy with risk of HCV infection among people who inject drugs.

methodsWe followed prospectively people who inject drugs at risk of acquiring HCV infection (who were RNA negative and HCV-antibody negative or positive) in Montréal, Canada (2004-2017). At 6-month, then 3-month intervals, participants were tested for HCV antibodies or RNA, and completed an interviewer-administered behavioural questionnaire, reporting the following: current exposure to opioid agonist treatment (yes/no), prescribed dosage either high (methadone ≥ 60 mg/d or buprenorphine ≥ 16 mg/d) or low, and perceived dosage adequacy (adequate/inadequate). We then assigned participants to 1 of 5 exposure categories: no opioid agonist treatment, high dosage of opioid agonist treatment perceived to be adequate, high dosage perceived to be inadequate, low dosage perceived to be adequate or low dosage perceived to be inadequate. To estimate associations between categories of opioid agonist treatment dosage and incident HCV infection, we conducted Cox regression analyses, adjusting for multiple confounding factors.

resultsOf 513 participants (median age 35.0 yr, 77.6% male), 168 acquired HCV over 1422.6 person-years of follow-up (incidence 11.8/100 person-years, 95% confidence interval [CI] 10.1-13.7). We observed a gradient in the relative risks of HCV infection across categories of opioid agonist treatment dosage. Compared with people who inject drugs not receiving opioid agonist treatment, adjusted hazard ratios were 0.43 (95% CI 0.23-0.84) for those receiving high dosages perceived to be adequate, 0.61 (95% CI 0.25-1.50) for those receiving high dosages perceived to be inadequate, 1.22 (95% CI 0.74-2.00) for those receiving low dosages perceived to be adequate and 1.94 (95% CI 1.11-3.39) for those receiving low dosages perceived to be inadequate.

interpretationRisk of HCV infection varies considerably according to dosage of opioid agonist treatment and patient-perceived adequacy, with associations indicating both protective and harmful effects relative to no exposure to opioid agonist treatment.

Indexed as

AdultBuprenorphineCohort StudiesDisease Transmission, InfectiousDrug UsersFemaleHepatitis CHumansInjections, IntravenousMaleMethadoneOpiate Substitution TreatmentOpioid-Related DisordersBuprenorphineMethadone

Identifiers

PMID31036608
PMCPMC6488472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.