Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31036065›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2019

A 117-year retrospective analysis of Pennsylvania tick community dynamics.

Damie Pak, Steven B Jacobs, Joyce M Sakamoto

Open access · goldAbstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Tick species infesting humans in the United States.Ticks and tick-borne diseases · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Tick abundance and life-stage segregation on the American black bear (International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2021
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Surveillance forVeterinary sciences · 2021
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Surveillance forVeterinary sciences · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Damie PakDepartment of Biology, Pennsylvania State University, W-234A, Millennium Science Complex, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.
Steven B JacobsDepartment of Entomology, Pennsylvania State University, 501 ASI Building, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.
Joyce M SakamotoDepartment of Entomology, Pennsylvania State University, W-104 Millennium Science Complex, University Park, PA, 16802, USA. jms1198@psu.edu.
Pennsylvania State University · US

Funding

College of Agricultural Sciences, Pennsylvania State University Sakamoto StartupHuck Institutes of the Life Sciences Sakamoto StartupNational Institute of Food and Agriculture Accession #1018545National Institute of Food and Agriculture Project #PEN0469National Science Foundation 1255832
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTick-borne diseases have been increasing at the local, national, and global levels. Researchers studying ticks and tick-borne diseases need a thorough knowledge of the pathogens, vectors, and epidemiology of disease spread. Both active and passive surveillance approaches are typically used to estimate tick population size and risk of tick encounter. Our data consists of a composite of active and long-term passive surveillance, which has provided insight into spatial variability and temporal dynamics of ectoparasite communities and identified rarer tick species. We present a retrospective analysis on compiled data of ticks from Pennsylvania over the last 117 years.

methodsWe compiled data from ticks collected during tick surveillance research, and from citizen-based submissions. The majority of the specimens were submitted by citizens. However, a subset of the data was collected through active methods (flagging or dragging, or removal of ticks from wildlife). We analyzed all data from 1900-2017 for tick community composition, host associations, and spatio-temporal dynamics.

resultsIn total there were 4491 submission lots consisting of 7132 tick specimens. Twenty-four different species were identified, with the large proportion of submissions represented by five tick species. We observed a shift in tick community composition in which the dominant species of tick (Ixodes cookei) was overtaken in abundance by Dermacentor variabilis in the early 1990s and then replaced in abundance by I. scapularis. We analyzed host data and identified overlaps in host range amongst tick species.

conclusionsWe highlight the importance of long-term passive tick surveillance in investigating the ecology of both common and rare tick species. Information on the geographical distribution, host-association, and seasonality of the tick community can help researchers and health-officials to identify high-risk areas.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, WildDermacentorEpidemiological MonitoringHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHumansIxodesPennsylvaniaRetrospective StudiesSpatial AnalysisTick-Borne DiseasesTick InfestationsTicksCommunity compositionMuseum collectionsPassive surveillanceTicks

Identifiers

PMID31036065
PMCPMC6489237
OpenAlexW2949802046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.