Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31036059›Full record

SynthesisParasites & vectors2019

Systematic review of gastrointestinal nematodes of horses from Australia.

Muhammad A Saeed, Ian Beveridge, Ghazanfar Abbas, Anne Beasley, Jenni Bauquier, Edwina Wilkes, Caroline Jacobson, Kris J Hughes, Charles El-Hage, Ryan O'Handley and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Parasites & vectors, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Egg reappearance periods of anthelmintics against equine cyathostomins: The state of play revisited.International journal for parasitology. Drugs and drug resistance · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Epidemiological study and risk factors of equine (Parasite epidemiology and control · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Muhammad A SaeedMelbourne Veterinary School, The University of Melbourne, Werribee, VIC, Australia.
Ian BeveridgeMelbourne Veterinary School, The University of Melbourne, Werribee, VIC, Australia.
Ghazanfar AbbasMelbourne Veterinary School, The University of Melbourne, Werribee, VIC, Australia.
Anne BeasleySchool of Veterinary Science, University of Queensland, Gatton, QLD, Australia.
Jenni BauquierMelbourne Veterinary School, The University of Melbourne, Werribee, VIC, Australia.
Edwina WilkesSchool of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, NSW, Australia.
Caroline JacobsonSchool of Veterinary & Life Sciences, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA, Australia.
Kris J HughesSchool of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, NSW, Australia.
Charles El-HageMelbourne Veterinary School, The University of Melbourne, Werribee, VIC, Australia.
Ryan O'HandleySchool of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, University of Adelaide, Roseworthy, SA, Australia.
John HurleySwettenham Stud, Nagambie, VIC, Australia.
Lucy CudmoreScone Equine Hospital, Scone, NSW, Australia.
Peter CarriganScone Equine Hospital, Scone, NSW, Australia.
Lisa WalterBoehringer Ingelheim Animal Health Australia Pty. Ltd, North Ryde, NSW, Australia.
Brett Tennent-BrownMelbourne Veterinary School, The University of Melbourne, Werribee, VIC, Australia.
Martin K NielsenM.H. Gluck Equine Research Center, Department of Veterinary Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
Abdul JabbarMelbourne Veterinary School, The University of Melbourne, Werribee, VIC, Australia. jabbara@unimelb.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8888-0046
The University of Melbourne · AUCharles Sturt University · AUBoehringer Ingelheim (Australia) · AUMurdoch University · AUThe University of Adelaide · AUThe University of Queensland · AUUniversity of Kentucky · US

Funding

Agrifutures Australia PRJ-011191
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEquine gastrointestinal nematodes (GINs) have been the subject of intermittent studies in Australia over the past few decades. However, comprehensive information on the epidemiology of equine GINs, the efficacy of available anthelmintic drugs and the prevalence of anthelmintic resistance (AR) in Australasia is lacking. Herein, we have systematically reviewed existing knowledge on the horse GINs recorded in Australia, and main aspects of their pathogeneses, epidemiology, diagnoses, treatment and control.

methodsSix electronic databases were searched for publications on GINs of Australian horses that met our inclusion criteria for the systematic review. Subsets of publications were subjected to review epidemiology, diagnoses, pathogeneses, treatment and control of GINs of horses from Australia.

resultsA total of 51 articles published between 1950 to 2018 were included. The main GINs reported in Australian horses were cyathostomins (at least 28 species), Draschia megastoma, Habronema muscae, H. majus, Oxyuris equi, Parascaris equorum, Strongyloides westeri and Trichostrongylus axei across different climatic regions of Queensland, New South Wales, Victoria, and Western Australia. Nematodes are diagnosed based on the traditional McMaster egg counting technique, though molecular markers to characterise common GINs of equines were characterised in 1990s. The use of anthelmintic drugs remains the most widely-used strategy for controlling equine GIN parasites in Australia; however, the threshold of faecal egg count that should trigger treatment in horses, remains controversial. Furthermore, anthelmintic resistance within GIN population of horses is becoming a common problem in Australia.

conclusionsAlthough GINs infecting Australian horses have been the subject of occasional studies over the past few decades, the effective control of GIN infections is hampered by a generalised lack of knowledge in various disciplines of equine parasitology. Therefore, coordinated and focused research is required to fill our knowledge gaps in these areas to maximise equine health and minimise economic losses associated with the parasitic infections in Australia.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnthelminticsFecesGastrointestinal TractHorsesNematodaNematode InfectionsNew South WalesParasite Egg CountParasitic Diseases, AnimalQueenslandVictoriaWestern AustraliaAnthelminticsAnthelmintic resistanceAustraliaGastrointestinal nematodesHorseStrongyles

Identifiers

PMID31036059
PMCPMC6489199
OpenAlexW2946385038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.