Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31036052›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2019

The opposing effects of interferon-beta and oncostatin-M as regulators of cancer stem cell plasticity in triple-negative breast cancer.

Mary R Doherty, Jenny G Parvani, Ilaria Tamagno, Damian J Junk, Benjamin L Bryson, Hyeon Joo Cheon, George R Stark, Mark W Jackson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Bridging Radiotherapy to Immunotherapy: The IFN-JAK-STAT Axis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Role of STAT3 signaling pathway in breast cancer.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mary R DohertyDepartment of Pathology, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
Jenny G ParvaniDepartment of Pathology, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA. jparvani@uic.edu.
Ilaria TamagnoDepartment of Pathology, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
Damian J JunkDepartment of Pathology, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
Benjamin L BrysonDepartment of Pathology, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
Hyeon Joo CheonDepartment of Cancer Biology, the Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
George R StarkCase Comprehensive Cancer Center, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
Mark W JacksonDepartment of Pathology, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA. mwj7@case.edu.
Case Western Reserve University · USCleveland Clinic · US

Funding

TUMOR METABOLISM PROGRAMP30CA043703 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI MARK R CHANCE · 1987 to 2026
$142.3M
TELOMERASE INACTIVATION BY RNASE L SIGNALS CELL DEATHP01CA062220 · NCI · CLEVELAND CLINIC LERNER COM-CWRU · PI LI, XIAOXIA, STARK, GEORGE ROBERT · 1994 to 2020
$35.6M
RESEARCH ONCOLOGY TRAINING GRANTT32CA059366 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI JACKSON, MARK W. · 1993 to 2025
$5.5M
Identification of a noval oncogene using validation-based insertional mutagenesisR01CA138421 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI JACKSON, MARK W. · 2010 to 2020
$3.2M
Interferon-beta inhibits the expansion of cancer stem-cellsR21CA198808 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI JACKSON, MARK W., STARK, GEORGE ROBERT · 2016 to 2017
$379k
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA062220NCI NIH HHS P30 CA043703NCI NIH HHS R01 CA138421NCI NIH HHS R21 CA198808NCI NIH HHS T32 CA059366
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHighly aggressive, metastatic and therapeutically resistant triple-negative breast cancers (TNBCs) are often enriched for cancer stem cells (CSC). Cytokines within the breast tumor microenvironment (TME) influence the CSC state by regulating tumor cell differentiation programs. Two prevalent breast TME cytokines are oncostatin-M (OSM) and interferon-β (IFN-β). OSM is a member of the IL-6 family of cytokines and can drive the de-differentiation of TNBC cells to a highly aggressive CSC state. Conversely, IFN-β induces the differentiation of TNBC, resulting in the repression of CSC properties. Here, we assess how these breast TME cytokines influence CSC plasticity and clinical outcome.

methodsUsing transformed human mammary epithelial cell (HMEC) and TNBC cell models, we assessed the CSC markers and properties following exposure to OSM and/or IFN-β. CSC markers included CD24, CD44, and SNAIL; CSC properties included tumor sphere formation, migratory capacity, and tumor initiation.

resultsThere are three major findings from our study. First, exposure of purified, non-CSC to IFN-β prevents OSM-mediated CD44 and SNAIL expression and represses tumor sphere formation and migratory capacity. Second, during OSM-induced de-differentiation, OSM represses endogenous IFN-β mRNA expression and autocrine/paracrine IFN-β signaling. Restoring IFN-β signaling to OSM-driven CSC re-engages IFN-β-mediated differentiation by repressing OSM/STAT3/SMAD3-mediated SNAIL expression, tumor initiation, and growth. Finally, the therapeutic use of IFN-β to treat OSM-driven tumors significantly suppresses tumor growth.

conclusionsOur findings suggest that the levels of IFN-β and OSM in TNBC dictate the abundance of cells with a CSC phenotype. Indeed, TNBCs with elevated IFN-β signaling have repressed CSC properties and a better clinical outcome. Conversely, TNBCs with elevated OSM signaling have a worse clinical outcome. Likewise, since OSM suppresses IFN-β expression and signaling, our studies suggest that strategies to limit OSM signaling or activate IFN-β signaling will disengage the de-differentiation programs responsible for the aggressiveness of TNBCs.

Indexed as

Cell Line, TumorCytokinesGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansInterferon-betaNeoplastic Stem CellsOncostatin MSignal TransductionSnail Family Transcription FactorsTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsCytokinesInterferon-betaOncostatin MSnail Family Transcription FactorsCancer stem cell plasticityCancer stem cellsInterferon-betaOncostatin-MSNAILTriple-negative breast cancerTumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID31036052
PMCPMC6489282
OpenAlexW2947815686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.