ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2019
The opposing effects of interferon-beta and oncostatin-M as regulators of cancer stem cell plasticity in triple-negative breast cancer.
Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
55 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 80 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bridging Radiotherapy to Immunotherapy: The IFN-JAK-STAT Axis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Pooled it
- Role of STAT3 signaling pathway in breast cancer.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2020Pooled it
- Oncostatin M as a Multifunctional Regulator of Breast Cancer Progression: Current Insights and Future Therapeutic Avenues.IUBMB life · 2026Review
- Apoptosis-inducing potential of tilorone dihydrochloride in triple-negative breast cancer: in silico and in vitro evidences.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- Oncogenic cell fate decision in breast epithelial cells I: growth factors and mechanisms.Research square · 2026Article
- A bibliometric analysis of trends and hotspots in Oncostatin M.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Cancer stem cells: landscape, challenges and emerging therapeutic innovations.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2025Review
- Targeting Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Resistance Mechanisms and Therapeutic Advancements.Cancer medicine · 2025Review
- Toll-Like receptor 3-mediated interferon-β production is suppressed by oncostatin m and a broader epithelial-mesenchymal transition program.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2024Article
- Significance of LIF/LIFR Signaling in the Progression of Obesity-Driven Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.Cancers · 2024Article
- Dissecting the emerging role of cancer-associated adipocyte-derived cytokines in remodeling breast cancer progression.Heliyon · 2024Review
- The Therapeutic Role of NPS-1034 in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma as Monotherapy and in Combination with Chemotherapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Grainyhead-like-2, an epithelial master programmer, promotes interferon induction and suppresses breast cancer recurrence.Molecular immunology · 2024Article
- Cancer cell plasticity: from cellular, molecular, and genetic mechanisms to tumor heterogeneity and drug resistance.Cancer metastasis reviews · 2024Review
- Tumor-educated Gr1+CD11b+ cells drive breast cancer metastasis via OSM/IL-6/JAK-induced cancer cell plasticity.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2024Article
- The role of metabolic reprogramming in immune escape of triple-negative breast cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Review
- Oncostatin-M and OSM-Receptor Feed-Forward Activation of MAPK Induces Separable Stem-like and Mesenchymal Programs.Molecular cancer research : MCR · 2023Article
- Revisiting Circulating Extracellular Matrix Fragments as Disease Markers in Myelofibrosis and Related Neoplasms.Cancers · 2023Review
- NOTCH pathway inactivation reprograms stem-like oral cancer cells to JAK-STAT dependent state and provides the opportunity of synthetic lethality.Translational oncology · 2023Article
- Changes in the mammary gland during aging and its links with breast diseases.Acta biochimica et biophysica Sinica · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHighly aggressive, metastatic and therapeutically resistant triple-negative breast cancers (TNBCs) are often enriched for cancer stem cells (CSC). Cytokines within the breast tumor microenvironment (TME) influence the CSC state by regulating tumor cell differentiation programs. Two prevalent breast TME cytokines are oncostatin-M (OSM) and interferon-β (IFN-β). OSM is a member of the IL-6 family of cytokines and can drive the de-differentiation of TNBC cells to a highly aggressive CSC state. Conversely, IFN-β induces the differentiation of TNBC, resulting in the repression of CSC properties. Here, we assess how these breast TME cytokines influence CSC plasticity and clinical outcome.
methodsUsing transformed human mammary epithelial cell (HMEC) and TNBC cell models, we assessed the CSC markers and properties following exposure to OSM and/or IFN-β. CSC markers included CD24, CD44, and SNAIL; CSC properties included tumor sphere formation, migratory capacity, and tumor initiation.
resultsThere are three major findings from our study. First, exposure of purified, non-CSC to IFN-β prevents OSM-mediated CD44 and SNAIL expression and represses tumor sphere formation and migratory capacity. Second, during OSM-induced de-differentiation, OSM represses endogenous IFN-β mRNA expression and autocrine/paracrine IFN-β signaling. Restoring IFN-β signaling to OSM-driven CSC re-engages IFN-β-mediated differentiation by repressing OSM/STAT3/SMAD3-mediated SNAIL expression, tumor initiation, and growth. Finally, the therapeutic use of IFN-β to treat OSM-driven tumors significantly suppresses tumor growth.
conclusionsOur findings suggest that the levels of IFN-β and OSM in TNBC dictate the abundance of cells with a CSC phenotype. Indeed, TNBCs with elevated IFN-β signaling have repressed CSC properties and a better clinical outcome. Conversely, TNBCs with elevated OSM signaling have a worse clinical outcome. Likewise, since OSM suppresses IFN-β expression and signaling, our studies suggest that strategies to limit OSM signaling or activate IFN-β signaling will disengage the de-differentiation programs responsible for the aggressiveness of TNBCs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.