Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31036021›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental health : a global access science source2019

Applying a cumulative risk framework to drinking water assessment: a commentary.

Tasha Stoiber, Alexis Temkin, David Andrews, Chris Campbell, Olga V Naidenko

Abstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental health : a global access science source, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Co-Occurrence of Metal Contaminants in United States Public Water Systems in 2013-2015.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Analysis of Cumulative Cancer Risk Associated with Disinfection Byproducts in United States Drinking Water.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tasha StoiberEnvironmental Working Group, 1436 U Street NW Suite 100, Washington, DC, 20009, USA. tstoiber@ewg.org.
Alexis TemkinEnvironmental Working Group, 1436 U Street NW Suite 100, Washington, DC, 20009, USA.
David AndrewsEnvironmental Working Group, 1436 U Street NW Suite 100, Washington, DC, 20009, USA.
Chris CampbellEnvironmental Working Group, 1436 U Street NW Suite 100, Washington, DC, 20009, USA.
Olga V NaidenkoEnvironmental Working Group, 1436 U Street NW Suite 100, Washington, DC, 20009, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The health risks of drinking water contaminants and the economic benefits of drinking water standards are typically assessed one chemical at a time, an approach that misses the health impacts of co-occurring contaminants in drinking water. In contrast, a cumulative risk framework has become common in air quality evaluations such as the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's National Air Toxics Assessment. We posit that the drinking water field would benefit from making the transition to a unified assessment framework for multiple contaminants that can overcome the long-standing challenge of treating cancer and non-cancer contaminants separately. Here we present a cumulative risk methodology that combines a risk-based cancer metric with a weighted health indicator index for non-cancer contaminants and incorporates disability weights from the Global Burden of Disease study. Our methodology generates a numeric toxicity score reflecting the potential health impacts for the sum of contaminants present in each sample of drinking water. Further research is needed to refine the risk and toxicity parameters for specific contaminants and to address the mode of interaction between co-occurring chemicals. As this cumulative risk model goes through future refinements, we anticipate that it would provide information that can help communities and policy makers evaluate different options for drinking water treatment.

Indexed as

Drinking WaterModels, TheoreticalHumansNeoplasmsRisk AssessmentWater Pollutants, ChemicalDrinking WaterWater Pollutants, ChemicalCumulative riskDisability weightingDrinking waterToxicity assessment

Identifiers

PMID31036021
PMCPMC6489338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.