Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31036015›Full record

ArticleRadiation oncology (London, England)2019

Changes of lung parenchyma density following high dose radiation therapy for thoracic carcinomas - an automated analysis of follow up CT scans.

Christina Schröder, Rita Engenhart-Cabillic, Sven Kirschner, Eyck Blank, André Buchali

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Radiation-induced lung injury - what do we know in the era of modern radiotherapy?Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Christina SchröderClinic for Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Clinic Giessen and Marburg, Marburg, Germany. christina.schroeder@usz.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4168-2795
Rita Engenhart-CabillicClinic for Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Clinic Giessen and Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Sven KirschnerClinic for Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Ruppiner Kliniken GmbH, Neuruppin, Germany.
Eyck BlankClinic for Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Ruppiner Kliniken GmbH, Neuruppin, Germany.
André BuchaliClinic for Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Ruppiner Kliniken GmbH, Neuruppin, Germany.
Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg · DEUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn objective way to qualify the effect of radiotherapy (RT) on lung tissue is the analysis of CT scans after RT. In this analysis we focused on the changes in Hounsfield units (ΔHU) and the correlation with the corresponding radiation dose after RT.

methodsPre- and post-RT CT scans were matched and ΔHU was calculated using customized research software. ΔHU was calculated in 5-Gy-intervals and the correlation between ΔHU and the corresponding dose was calculated as well as the regression coefficients. Additionally the mean ΔHU and ΔHU in 5-Gy-intervals were calculated for each tumor entity.

resultsThe mean density changes at 12 weeks and 6 months post RT were 28,16 HU and 32,83 HU. The correlation coefficient between radiation dose and ΔHU at 12 weeks and 6 months were 0,166 (p = 0,000) and 0,158 (p = 0,000). The resulting regression coefficient were 1439 HU/Gy (p = 0,000) and 1612 HU/Gy (p = 0,000). The individual regression coefficients for each patient range from - 2,23 HU/Gy to 7,46 HU/Gy at 12 weeks and - 0,45 HU/Gy to 10,51 HU/Gy at 6 months. When looking at the three tumor entities individually the highest ΔHU at 12 weeks was seen in patients with SCLC (38,13 HU) and at 6 month in those with esophageal carcinomas (40,98 HU).

conclusionFor most dose intervals there was an increase of ΔHU with an increased radiation dose. This is reflected by a statistically significant, although low correlation coefficient. The regression coefficients of all patients show large interindividual differences.

Indexed as

AgedCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedLungLung NeoplasmsMaleParenchymal TissuePrognosisRadiotherapySmall Cell Lung CarcinomaThoracic NeoplasmsTomography, X-Ray ComputedLungLung functionPulmonary fibrosisRadiation injuriesThoracic neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID31036015
PMCPMC6489276
OpenAlexW2946851046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.