Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31035987›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2019

Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging study of a normal tarsal joint in a Bengal tiger (Panthera tigris).

Alberto Arencibia, Jorge Matos, Mario Encinoso, Francisco Gil, Alejandro Artiles, Francisco Martínez-Gomariz, José Maria Vázquez

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Cory's Shearwater (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Cranial Investigations of Crested Porcupine (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Anatomic Study of the Elbow Joint in a Bengal Tiger (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alberto ArencibiaDepartment of Morphology, Veterinary Faculty, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Trasmontaña s/n, 35413, Arucas, Gran Canaria, Spain. alberto.arencibia@ulpgc.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6797-8220
Jorge MatosDepartment of Morphology, Veterinary Faculty, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Trasmontaña s/n, 35413, Arucas, Gran Canaria, Spain.
Mario EncinosoVeterinary Hospital Los Tarahales, Recta de Los Tarahales 15, 35013, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain.
Francisco GilDepartment of Anatomy and Comparative Anatomy, Veterinary Faculty, University of Murcia, Campus de Espinardo, 30071, Murcia, Spain.
Alejandro ArtilesVeterinary Hospital Los Tarahales, Recta de Los Tarahales 15, 35013, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain.
Francisco Martínez-GomarizDepartment of Anatomy and Comparative Anatomy, Veterinary Faculty, University of Murcia, Campus de Espinardo, 30071, Murcia, Spain.
José Maria VázquezDepartment of Anatomy and Comparative Anatomy, Veterinary Faculty, University of Murcia, Campus de Espinardo, 30071, Murcia, Spain.
Universidad de Murcia · ESUniversidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn this research, using computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), we provide a thorough description of the standard appearance of a right tarsal joint in a Bengal tiger (Panthera tigris). CT scans were performed using a bone and soft tissue window setting, and three-dimensional surface reconstructed CT images were obtained. The MRI protocol was based on the use of Spin-echo (SE) T1-weighted and Gradient-echo (GE) STIR T2-weighted pulse sequences. Magnetic resonance (MR) images were taken in the transverse, sagittal and dorsal planes. We also performed anatomical dissections to facilitate the interpretation of the different structures of the tarsus joint and allow comparisons with CT and MRI images.

resultsThe CT images allowed us to observe differences between the bones and soft tissues of the tarsal joint. When applying the bone window setting, the obtained footage showed the anatomy between the medulla and cortex. Additionally, the trabecular bone was delineated. By contrast, the soft tissue window allowed the main soft tissue structures of the tarsal joint, including ligaments, muscles and tendons, to be differentiated. Footage of the main anatomical structures of the standard tiger tarsus was obtained through MRI. The SE T1-weighted images showed the best evaluation of the cortical, subchondral and trabecular bone of the tibia, fibula, tarsus and metatarsus bones. Nonetheless, the GE STIR T2-weighted images allowed us to better visualize the articular cartilage and synovial fluid. In both MRI pulse sequences, the ligaments and tendons appeared with low signal intensity compared with muscles that were visible with intermediate signal intensity.

conclusionsThe results of this CT and MRI study of the Bengal tiger tarsal joint provide some valuable anatomical information and may be useful for diagnosing disorders in this large non-domestic cat.

Indexed as

TigersAnimalsCadaverFemaleMagnetic Resonance ImagingTarsus, AnimalTomography, X-Ray ComputedAnatomyComputed tomographyMagnetic resonance imagingTarsal jointTiger

Identifiers

PMID31035987
PMCPMC6487530
OpenAlexW2946880043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.