Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31035978›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2019

The use of self-management strategies for problem gambling: a scoping review.

Flora I Matheson, Sarah Hamilton-Wright, David T Kryszajtys, Jessica L Wiese, Lauren Cadel, Carolyn Ziegler, Stephen W Hwang, Sara J T Guilcher

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Qualitative Experience of Self-Exclusion Programs: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Gambling Self-Control Strategies: A Qualitative Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Changes in Gambling Behavior during the COVID-19 Pandemic-A Web Survey Study in Sweden.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Flora I MathesonMAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, St. Michael's Hospital, 30 Bond Street, Toronto, ON, M5B 1W8, Canada. mathesonf@smh.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0965-1048
Sarah Hamilton-WrightMAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, St. Michael's Hospital, 30 Bond Street, Toronto, ON, M5B 1W8, Canada.
David T KryszajtysMAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, St. Michael's Hospital, 30 Bond Street, Toronto, ON, M5B 1W8, Canada.
Jessica L WieseMAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, St. Michael's Hospital, 30 Bond Street, Toronto, ON, M5B 1W8, Canada.
Lauren CadelLeslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Carolyn ZieglerHealth Information Sciences Library, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Stephen W HwangMAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, St. Michael's Hospital, 30 Bond Street, Toronto, ON, M5B 1W8, Canada.
Sara J T GuilcherMAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, St. Michael's Hospital, 30 Bond Street, Toronto, ON, M5B 1W8, Canada.
St. Michael's Hospital · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research Clinician Scientist AwardOntario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care Ministry Grant #438
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProblem gambling (PG) is a serious public health concern that disproportionately affects people experiencing poverty, homelessness, and multimorbidity including mental health and substance use concerns. Little research has focused on self-help and self-management in gambling recovery, despite evidence that a substantial number of people do not seek formal treatment. This study explored the literature on PG self-management strategies. Self-management was defined as the capacity to manage symptoms, the intervention, health consequences and altered lifestyle that accompanies a chronic health concern.

methodsWe searched 10 databases to identity interdisciplinary articles from the social sciences, allied health professions, nursing and psychology, between 2000 and June 28, 2017. We reviewed records for eligibility and extracted data from relevant articles. Studies were included in the review if they examined PG self-management strategies used by adults (18+) in at least a subset of the sample, and in which PG was confirmed using a validated diagnostic or screening tool.

resultsWe conducted a scoping review of studies from 2000 to 2017, identifying 31 articles that met the criteria for full text review from a search strategy that yielded 2662 potential articles. The majority of studies examined self-exclusion (39%), followed by use of workbooks (35%), and money or time limiting strategies (17%). The remaining 8% focused on cognitive, behavioural and coping strategies, stress management, and mindfulness.

conclusionsGiven that a minority of people with gambling concerns seek treatment, that stigma is an enormous barrier to care, and that PG services are scarce and most do not address multimorbidity, it is important to examine the personal self-management of gambling as an alternative to formalized treatment.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalGamblingHealth BehaviorHumansIll-Housed PersonsMindfulnessSelf-ManagementCopingCoping skillsGamblersGamblingProblem gamblingScoping reviewSelf-efficacySelf-exclusionSelf-helpSelf-managementStrategies

Identifiers

PMID31035978
PMCPMC6489359
OpenAlexW2947151442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.