Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31035974›Full record

Observational studyBMC oral health2019

Toothbrushing behavior in children - an observational study of toothbrushing performance in 12 year olds.

Renate Deinzer, Oliver Cordes, Julia Weber, Lisa Hassebrauck, Ulrike Weik, Norbert Krämer, Klaus Pieper, Jutta Margraf-Stiksrud

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC oral health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Exploring Toothbrushing Duration Among Adults: A Systematic Review.International journal of dental hygiene · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Comparative evaluation of cranberry extract and sodium fluoride as mouth rinses on S. mutans counts in children: a double-blind randomized controlled trial.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2024
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Renate DeinzerInstitute of Medical Psychology, Department of Medicine, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Klinikstr. 29, D-35392, Giessen, Germany. renate.deinzer@mp.jlug.de.ORCID 0000-0002-2867-4029
Oliver CordesInstitute of Medical Psychology, Department of Medicine, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Klinikstr. 29, D-35392, Giessen, Germany.
Julia WeberInstitute of Medical Psychology, Department of Medicine, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Klinikstr. 29, D-35392, Giessen, Germany.
Lisa HassebrauckInstitute of Medical Psychology, Department of Medicine, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Klinikstr. 29, D-35392, Giessen, Germany.
Ulrike WeikInstitute of Medical Psychology, Department of Medicine, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Klinikstr. 29, D-35392, Giessen, Germany.
Norbert KrämerInstitute of Medical Psychology, Department of Medicine, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Klinikstr. 29, D-35392, Giessen, Germany.
Klaus PieperDepartment of Medicine, Philipps University of Marburg, Georg-Voigt-Straße 3, D-35039, Marburg, Germany.
Jutta Margraf-StiksrudDepartment of Psychology, Philipps University of Marburg, Gutenbergstr. 18, D-35032, Marburg, Germany.
Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen · DEPhilipps University of Marburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany countries offer systematic group prevention programs in kindergarten and school in order to promote children's oral health. Little is known, however, about the actual toothbrushing abilities of children when group prevention programs end.

methodsIn Germany, all children take advantage from a nationwide group prevention program (called "Gruppenprophylaxe") lasting from kindergarten up to sixth grade (12 years of age). Standardized recommendations are given concerning brushing systematics and brushing movements. N = 174 children at the age of 12 were thus randomly selected from two German towns and were asked to perform toothbrushing to the best of their abilities in front of a mirror which also served as a camera. Brushing behavior was analyzed by video analysis.

resultsChildren brushed their teeth for an average of 200 s ± 80.48 s (mean ± SD). Still, more than 55% missed at least one sextant when brushing inner surfaces, 16% missed them all. Only 7.5% of the children brushed both inner and outer surfaces by the intended movements (vertical movements on the inner surfaces and circular movements on the outer surfaces) for at least 90% of the respective brushing time. Instead, horizontal brushing was very common on the lateral surfaces.

conclusionsThe present analysis indicates that children have low efficiency to adopt the tooth-brushing recommendations given in prevention programs. This is surprising as great endeavors are made to help children internalize the recommendations. Future research is needed to better understand which factors impede adoption of toothbrushing recommendations in children and which efforts are necessary to improve their toothbrushing abilities.

Indexed as

Health BehaviorChildGermanyHumansToothbrushingBehavioral scienceCommunity dentistryDental educationDental hygieneOral hygienePreventive dentistryToothbrushing

Identifiers

PMID31035974
PMCPMC6489256
OpenAlexW2947076251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.