Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31035965›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2019

CD44, TGM2 and EpCAM as novel plasma markers in endometrial cancer diagnosis.

Anna Torres, Małgorzata Pac-Sosińska, Krzysztof Wiktor, Tomasz Paszkowski, Ryszard Maciejewski, Kamil Torres

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. The role of CSTF2 in gastric cancer: implications for therapy.European journal of medical research · 2025
    Article
  3. Prognostic Role of L1CAM in Endometrial Cancer.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Druggable genetic targets in endometrial cancerCancer treatment and research communications · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The Elusive Endometrial Epithelial Stem/Progenitor Cells.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anna TorresLaboratory of Biostructure, Chair of Human Anatomy, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland. anna.torres@wp.pl.
Małgorzata Pac-SosińskaLaboratory of Biostructure, Chair of Human Anatomy, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Krzysztof WiktorLaboratory of Diagnostic Procedures, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Tomasz PaszkowskiIII Chair and Department of Gynaecology, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Ryszard MaciejewskiLaboratory of Biostructure, Chair of Human Anatomy, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Kamil TorresLaboratory of Biostructure, Chair of Human Anatomy, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Medical University of Lublin · PL

Funding

Uniwersytet Medyczny w Lublinie grant #DS 204
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEndometrial cancer (EC) is the most common malignancy of the female reproductive tract. Despite years of research, the accurate screening strategy is still not available in this disease and it is usually diagnosed only after the clinical signs are present. The recent technological advances in analytical methodologies enabled detection of multiple molecules in one, small sample of biological materials. Such approach was undertaken in the presented study.

methodsConcentrations of aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 family, member A1 (ALDH1A1), carbonic anhydrase IX (CA9), CD44, epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM), hepsin, kallikrein-6, mesothelin, midkine, neural cell adhesion molecule L1 (L1CAM), and transglutaminase 2 (TGM2) were measured using MAGPIX®System in plasma samples of 45 EC, 20 healthy controls and 11 patients with endometriosis.

resultsSignificantly increased concentration in EC as compared to healthy controls were found in case of CD44 (p <  0.001), EpCAM (p = 0.033) and TGM2 (p <  0.001). EpCAM and mesothelin concentrations differed based on FIGO stages. Regression analysis revealed marker panels with high accuracy in detection of EC. The highest AUC 0.937 was attributed to the 3-marker panel of CD44/TGM2/EpCAM (84% sensitivity, 100% specificity), FIGO IA samples were discriminated from more advanced stages of EC with the mesothelin/grade 1 model featuring AUC of 0.911 (95.24% sensitivity, 78.26% specificity).

conclusionsNovel plasma biomarkers presenting good accuracy in diagnosing EC were found with TGM2 reported for the first time as plasma marker. It was also revealed that endometriosis may share similarities in the pattern of markers alterations characteristic for EC.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorEndometrial NeoplasmsEndometriosisEpithelial Cell Adhesion MoleculeFemaleGTP-Binding ProteinsHumansHyaluronan ReceptorsLogistic ModelsNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm StagingProtein Glutamine gamma Glutamyltransferase 2ROC CurveTransglutaminasesBiomarkers, TumorCD44 protein, humanEPCAM protein, humanEpithelial Cell Adhesion MoleculeGTP-Binding ProteinsHyaluronan ReceptorsProtein Glutamine gamma Glutamyltransferase 2TGM2 protein, humanTransglutaminasesCD44Endometrial cancerEndometriosisEpCAMNovel plasma markersTGM2

Identifiers

PMID31035965
PMCPMC6489287
OpenAlexW2946962077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.