ArticleBMC medical imaging2019
Effect of exposure parameters of cone beam computed tomography on metal artifact reduction around the dental implants in various bone densities.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Diagnostic efficacy of cone-beam computed tomography for detection of vertical root fractures in endodontically treated teeth: a systematic review.BMC medical imaging · 2023Pooled it
- Effect of Phantom Containing Implants Angulation on the Amount of Metal Artifacts Around the Implants in CBCT Images.International journal of dentistry · 2026Article
- Bone quality assessment around dental implants in cone-beam CT images: effect of rotation mode and metal artefact reduction tool.Dento maxillo facial radiology · 2025Article
- Development of a Clinically Applicable Deep Learning System Based on Sparse Training Data to Accurately Detect Acute Intracranial Hemorrhage from Non-enhanced Head Computed Tomography.Neurologia medico-chirurgica · 2025Article
- Effect of metal artefact reduction level on the assessment of dental implant positioning by cone-beam computed tomography.Dento maxillo facial radiology · 2024Article
- The Effect of Changes in the Angular Position of Implants on Metal Artifact Reduction in Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Images: A Scoping Review.Radiology research and practice · 2023Article
- Comparison of the amount of artifacts induced by zirconium and titanium implants in cone-beam computed tomography images.BMC medical imaging · 2022Article
- The Impact of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Exposure Parameters on Peri-Implant Artifacts: A Literature Review.Cureus · 2022Review
- Assessment of marginal gaps and image quality of crowns made of two different restorative materials: An in vitro study using CBCT images.Journal of dental research, dental clinics, dental prospects · 2022Article
- Evaluation of the dimensions, morphology, and position of the mandibular condyles in individuals with neurofibromatosis 1: a case-control study.Clinical oral investigations · 2022Article
- Do the number of basis images and metal artifact reduction affect the production of artifacts near and far from zirconium dental implants in CBCT?Clinical oral investigations · 2021Article
- Influence of size of field of view (FOV), position within the FOV, and scanning mode on the detection of root fracture and observer's perception of artifacts in CBCT images.Dento maxillo facial radiology · 2021Article
- Cone-beam computed tomography artifacts in the presence of dental implants and associated factors: an integrative review.Imaging science in dentistry · 2021Article
- Evaluating the effects of orthodontic materials, field of view, and artifact reduction mode on accuracy of CBCT-based caries detection.Clinical oral investigations · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to assess the effect of exposure parameters such as milliampere (mA) and field of view (FOV) of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) on a metal artifact of dental implants placed in different bone densities.
methodsA total of 27 bone blocks with different densities (nine were type 1, nine were types 2 and 3, and nine were type 4) were used in this in vitro, experimental study. These blocks were placed in mandibular wax models. The blocks were scanned after drilling (hole preparation) and after implant placement using Cranex3D imaging system with a 4 × 6 cm
resultsIn general, irrespective of bone density, the amount of artifacts was lower in small FOV compared to large FOV (P < 0.05). Change of mA had no effect on metal artifacts (P > 0.05). Artifacts in type 4 bone were greater than in other bone types (P < 0.05). Difference between type 1 and types 2 and 3 was not significant (P > 0.05).
conclusionAccording to the results of this study, Peri-implant artifacts were seen in all bone types; the amount of artifacts in type 4 bone was higher than that in other types. Size of FOV and bone density affect the metal artifacts around dental implants; so that a smaller FOV can be used to decrease metal artifacts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.