Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31035945›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2019

Plasma levels of M-CSF and VEGF in laboratory diagnostics and differentiation of selected histological types of cervical cancers.

Iwona Sidorkiewicz, Monika Zbucka-Krętowska, Kamil Zaręba, Emilia Lubowicka, Monika Zajkowska, Maciej Szmitkowski, Ewa Gacuta, Sławomir Ławicki

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. The emerging era of personalized medicine in advanced colorectal cancer.Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2022
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Iwona SidorkiewiczDepartment of Reproduction and Gynecological Endocrinology, Medical University of Bialystok, 15-276, Bialystok, Poland. iwona.sidorkiewicz@umb.edu.pl.
Monika Zbucka-KrętowskaDepartment of Reproduction and Gynecological Endocrinology, Medical University of Bialystok, 15-276, Bialystok, Poland.
Kamil ZarębaDepartment of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Medical University of Białystok, 15-276, Bialystok, Poland.
Emilia LubowickaDepartment of Esthetic Medicine, Medical University of Bialystok, 15-089, Bialystok, Poland.
Monika ZajkowskaDepartment of Biochemical Diagnostics, Medical University of Bialystok, 15-269, Bialystok, Poland.
Maciej SzmitkowskiDepartment of Biochemical Diagnostics, Medical University of Bialystok, 15-269, Bialystok, Poland.
Ewa GacutaDepartment of Perinatology, Medical University of Bialystok, 15-276, Bialystok, Poland.
Sławomir ŁawickiDepartment of Population Medicine and Civilization Diseases Prevention, Medical University of Bialystok, 15-269, Bialystok, Poland.
Medical University of Białystok · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe search of useful serum biomarkers for the early detection of cervical cancers has been of a high priority. The activation of Macrophage-Colony Stimulating Factor (M-CSF) and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) is likely involved in the pathogenesis and spread of cancer. We compared the plasma levels of M-CSF and VEGF to the ones of commonly accepted tumor markers CA 125and SCC-Ag in three groups of patients: 1. the cervical cancer group (patients with either squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma); 2. the cervical dysplasia group; 3. the control group.

methodsThis cohort study included 100 patients with cervical cancer and 55 patients with cervical dysplasia. The control group consisted of 50 healthy volunteers. The plasma levels of VEGF and M-CSF were determined using ELISA, while CA 125 and SCC-Ag concentrations were obtained by the chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay (CMIA).

resultsThe median levels of M-CSF and VEGF as well as CA 125 and SCC-Ag in the entire group of cervical cancer patients, were significantly different compared to the healthy women group. In case of both the squamous cell carcinoma and the adenocarcinoma groups, plasma levels of M-CSF and VEGF were higher compared to the control group. No significant differences in the studied parameters between the squamous cell carcinoma and the adenocarcinoma group were observed. The highest sensitivity and specificity were obtained for VEGF (81.18 and 76.00%, respectively) and SCC-Ag (81.18%; 74.00%) in the squamous cell carcinoma group and for VEGF (86.67%; 76.00%) in the adenocarcinoma group. The area under the ROC curve for VEGF was the largest in the adenocarcinoma group followed by the squamous cell carcinoma group (0.9082 and 0.8566 respectively).

conclusionsObtained results indicate a possible clinical applicability and a high diagnostic power for the combination of MSC-F, VEGF, CA 125 and SCC-Ag in the diagnosis of both studied types of cervical cancer.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAdultAntigens, NeoplasmBiomarkers, TumorCA-125 AntigenCarcinoma, Squamous CellCohort StudiesDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansMacrophage Colony-Stimulating FactorMiddle AgedROC CurveSerpinsUterine Cervical DysplasiaUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAntigens, NeoplasmBiomarkers, TumorCA-125 AntigenMacrophage Colony-Stimulating FactorSerpinssquamous cell carcinoma-related antigenVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AAdenocarcinomaCervical cancerM-CSFSerum markerSquamous cell carcinomaTumor markerVEGF

Identifiers

PMID31035945
PMCPMC6489352
OpenAlexW2947053041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.