Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31035941›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2019

Diversity and community of methanogens in the large intestine of finishing pigs.

Jiandui Mi, Haiyan Peng, Yinbao Wu, Yan Wang, Xindi Liao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. The Diversity, Composition, and Metabolic Pathways of Archaea in Pigs.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 3 countries.

Jiandui MiCollege of Animal Science, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, South China Agricultural University, Wushan Road, Tianhe District, Guangzhou, 510642, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-5918-5295
Haiyan PengCollege of Animal Science, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, South China Agricultural University, Wushan Road, Tianhe District, Guangzhou, 510642, People's Republic of China.
Yinbao WuCollege of Animal Science, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, South China Agricultural University, Wushan Road, Tianhe District, Guangzhou, 510642, People's Republic of China.
Yan WangCollege of Animal Science, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, South China Agricultural University, Wushan Road, Tianhe District, Guangzhou, 510642, People's Republic of China.
Xindi LiaoCollege of Animal Science, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, South China Agricultural University, Wushan Road, Tianhe District, Guangzhou, 510642, People's Republic of China. xdliao@scau.edu.cn.
South China Agricultural University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMethane emissions from pigs account for 10% of total methane production from livestock in China. Methane emissions not only contribute to global warming, as it has 25 times the global warming potential (GWP) of CO

resultA total of 219 clones were examined using the methyl coenzyme reductase subunit A gene (mcrA) and assigned to 43 operational taxonomic units (OTUs) based on a 97% species-level identity criterion. The family Methanobacteriaceae was the dominant methanogen in colonic digesta of finishing pigs, accounting for approximately 70.6% of the identified methanogens, and comprised mainly the genera Methanobrevibacter (57%) and Methanosphaera (14%). The order Methanomassiliicoccales, classified as an uncultured taxonomy, accounted for 15.07%. The methanogenic archaeon WGK1 and unclassified Methanomicrobiales belonging to the order of Methanomicrobiales accounted for 4.57 and 1.37%, respectively. The Eh was negative and within the range - 297.00~423.00 mV and the pH was within the range 5.04~6.97 in the large intestine. The populations of total methanogens and Methanobacteriales were stable in different parts of the large intestine according to real-time PCR.

conclusionThe major methanogen in the large intestine of finishing pigs was Methanobrevibacter. The seventh order Methanomassiliicoccales and species Methanosphaera stadtmanae present in the large intestine of pigs might contribute to the transfer of hydrogen and fewer methane emissions. The redox potential (Eh) was higher in the large intestine of finishing pigs, which had a positive correlation with the population of Methanobacteriale.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeAnimalsChinaColonDNA Restriction EnzymesDNA, RibosomalFatty Acids, VolatileFemaleHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationIntestine, LargeMaleMethaneMethanobacteriaceaeMethanobrevibacterOxidation-ReductionPhylogenyDNA Restriction EnzymesDNA, Ribosomalendodeoxyribonuclease McrAFatty Acids, VolatileMethaneRNA, Ribosomal, 16SLarge intestineMethanogenPigRedox potential

Identifiers

PMID31035941
PMCPMC6489232
OpenAlexW2947765309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.