Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31035927›Full record

ArticleBMC molecular biology2019

Identification and validation of reference genes for real-time quantitative RT-PCR analysis in jute.

Md Sabbir Hossain, Rasel Ahmed, Md Samiul Haque, Md Monjurul Alam, Md Shahidul Islam

Open access · hybridAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC molecular biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. qPCR-Based Reference Gene Validation inCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Identification and validation of reference genes in vetiver (Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Selection and Validation of Reference Genes for RT-qPCR Analysis inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Identification of valid reference genes for quantitative RT-PCR inPhysiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Md Sabbir HossainBasic and Applied Research on Jute Project, Bangladesh Jute Research Institute, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Rasel AhmedBasic and Applied Research on Jute Project, Bangladesh Jute Research Institute, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Md Samiul HaqueBasic and Applied Research on Jute Project, Bangladesh Jute Research Institute, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Md Monjurul AlamBasic and Applied Research on Jute Project, Bangladesh Jute Research Institute, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Md Shahidul IslamBasic and Applied Research on Jute Project, Bangladesh Jute Research Institute, Dhaka, Bangladesh. nshahidul@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-4344-2429
Bangladesh Jute Research Institute · BD

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith the availability of genome sequences, gene expression analysis of jute has drawn considerable attention for understanding the regulatory mechanisms of fiber development and improving fiber quality. Gene expression profiles of a target gene can provide valuable clues towards the understanding of its biological function. Reverse transcription quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) is the best method for targeted gene expression analysis due to its sensitivity and reproducibility. However, calculating relative expression requires reference genes, which must be stable across various biological conditions. For this purposes, 11 prospective genes namely, 28S RNA, ACT7, CYP, EF1A, EF2, ETIF3E, GAPDH, PP2Ac, PTB, UBC2 and UBI1 were evaluated for their potential use as reference genes in jute.

resultsThe expression stabilities of eleven prospective genes were analyzed in various jute plant tissues, such as the root, stick, bark, leaf, flower, seed and fiber, as well as under abiotic (waterlogged, drought and salinity) and biotic stress (infestation with Macrophomina phaseolina) conditions with different time points. All 11 genes were variably expressed in different tissues and stress conditions. To find suitable reference genes in different sample sets, a comprehensive approach based on four statistical algorithms such as GeNorm, BestKeeper, NormFinder the ΔCt was used. The PP2Ac and EF2 genes were the most stably expressed across the different tissues. ACT7 and UBC2 were suitable reference genes under drought stress, and CYP and PP2Ac were the most appropriate after inoculation with Macrophomina phaseolina. Under salinity stress, PP2Ac and UBC2 were the best genes, and ACT7 and PP2Ac were the most suitable under waterlogged conditions.

conclusionExpression stability of reference genes from jute varied in different tissues and selected experimental conditions. Our results provide a valuable resource for the accurate normalization of gene expression experiments in fiber research for important bast fiber crops.

Indexed as

Chromosomes, PlantCorchorusGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, PlantPlant Components, AerialPlant RootsReference StandardsReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionTranscriptomeGene expressionJuteqRT-PCRReference gene

Identifiers

PMID31035927
PMCPMC6489354
OpenAlexW2947604541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.