Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31035612›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2019

IoT in Healthcare: Achieving Interoperability of High-Quality Data Acquired by IoT Medical Devices.

Argyro Mavrogiorgou, Athanasios Kiourtis, Konstantinos Perakis, Stamatios Pitsios, Dimosthenis Kyriazis

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
9.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 105 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Wearable health devices and personal area networks: can they improve outcomes in haemodialysis patients?Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Argyro MavrogiorgouDepartment of Digital Systems, University of Piraeus, M. Karaoli & A. Dimitriou 80, 18534 Piraeus, Greece. margy@unipi.gr.
Athanasios KiourtisDepartment of Digital Systems, University of Piraeus, M. Karaoli & A. Dimitriou 80, 18534 Piraeus, Greece. kiourtis@unipi.gr.
Konstantinos PerakisSingular Logic EU Projects Department, Achaias 3, 14564 Kifisia, Greece. kperakis@ep.singularlogic.eu.
Stamatios PitsiosSingular Logic EU Projects Department, Achaias 3, 14564 Kifisia, Greece. stamatis.pit@gmail.com.
Dimosthenis KyriazisDepartment of Digital Systems, University of Piraeus, M. Karaoli & A. Dimitriou 80, 18534 Piraeus, Greece. dimos@unipi.gr.
University of Piraeus · GRSingularLogic (Greece) · GR

Funding

Horizon 2020 Framework Programme 727560
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is an undeniable fact that Internet of Things (IoT) technologies have become a milestone advancement in the digital healthcare domain, since the number of IoT medical devices is grown exponentially, and it is now anticipated that by 2020 there will be over 161 million of them connected worldwide. Therefore, in an era of continuous growth, IoT healthcare faces various challenges, such as the collection, the quality estimation, as well as the interpretation and the harmonization of the data that derive from the existing huge amounts of heterogeneous IoT medical devices. Even though various approaches have been developed so far for solving each one of these challenges, none of these proposes a holistic approach for successfully achieving data interoperability between high-quality data that derive from heterogeneous devices. For that reason, in this manuscript a mechanism is produced for effectively addressing the intersection of these challenges. Through this mechanism, initially, the collection of the different devices' datasets occurs, followed by the cleaning of them. In sequel, the produced cleaning results are used in order to capture the levels of the overall data quality of each dataset, in combination with the measurements of the availability of each device that produced each dataset, and the reliability of it. Consequently, only the high-quality data is kept and translated into a common format, being able to be used for further utilization. The proposed mechanism is evaluated through a specific scenario, producing reliable results, achieving data interoperability of 100% accuracy, and data quality of more than 90% accuracy.

Indexed as

Data AccuracyDelivery of Health CareHumansInternetMonitoring, Physiologicdata cleaningdata heterogeneitydata interoperabilitydata qualityhealthcareheterogeneous devicesinternet of thingsmedical devicesquality assessment

Identifiers

PMID31035612
PMCPMC6539021
OpenAlexW2940524603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.