ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2019
Biomechanical Evaluation of Promising Different Bone Substitutes in a Clinically Relevant Test Set-Up.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical and Biomechanical Determinants of Fixation Failure in Fifth Metatarsal Fractures: Implications for Surgical Decision-Making.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Bone filler and adhesive at the same time: in-vitro analysis in a porcine fracture model.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
- Biomechanical Performance and Handling of Mineral-Organic Adhesive Bone Cements Based on Magnesium Under Clinical Test Conditions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- A magnesium calcium phosphate-based cement as a bone adhesive: characterization and biomechanical evaluation.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
- Developments in Alloplastic Bone Grafts and Barrier Membrane Biomaterials for Periodontal Guided Tissue and Bone Regeneration Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Bone Cements Used in Vertebral Augmentation: A State-of-the-art Narrative Review.Journal of pain research · 2024Review
- Article
- Degradation and Bone-Contact Biocompatibility of Two Drillable Magnesium Phosphate Bone Cements in an In Vivo Rabbit Bone Defect Model.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Degradation of 3D-printed magnesium phosphate ceramicsBioactive materials · 2023Article
- Plate osteosynthesis combined with bone cement provides the highest stability for tibial head depression fractures under high loading conditions.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- [Cement augmentation and bone graft substitutes-Materials and biomechanics].Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2022Review
- Experimental Drillable Magnesium Phosphate Cement Is a Promising Alternative to Conventional Bone Cements.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Cement augmentation for trochanteric fracture in elderly: A systematic review.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2021Review
- Cement-augmented screw fixation for calcaneal fracture treatment: a biomechanical study comparing two injectable bone substitutes.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2020Article
- Development and Bone Regeneration Capacity of Premixed Magnesium Phosphate Cement Pastes.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
(1) Background: Bone substitutes are essential in orthopaedic surgery to fill up large bone defects. Thus, the aim of the study was to compare diverse bone fillers biomechanically to each other in a clinical-relevant test set-up and to detect differences in stability and handling for clinical use. (2) Methods: This study combined compressive strength tests and screw pullout-tests with dynamic tests of bone substitutes in a clinical-relevant biomechanical fracture model. Beyond well-established bone fillers (ChronOS
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.