Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31034869›Full record

ArticleJournal of pain and symptom management2019

Giving Voice to Patient Values Throughout Cancer: A Novel Nurse-Led Intervention.

Andrew S Epstein, Anjali V Desai, Camila Bernal, Danielle Romano, Peter J Wan, Molly Okpako, Kelly Anderson, Kimberly Chow, Dana Kramer, Claudia Calderon and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pain and symptom management, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Advance Care Planning in Serious Illness: A Narrative Review.Journal of pain and symptom management · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Andrew S EpsteinMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA. Electronic address: epsteina@mskcc.org.
Anjali V DesaiMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA.
Camila BernalMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Danielle RomanoMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Peter J WanMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Molly OkpakoMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Kelly AndersonMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Kimberly ChowMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Dana KramerMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Claudia CalderonMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Virginia V KlimekMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA.
Robin Rawlins-DuellMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Diane L ReidyMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA.
Jessica I GoldbergMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Elizabeth CruzMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Judith E NelsonMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextOptimal advance care planning allows patients to articulate their values as a touchstone for medical decision making. Ideally, this occurs when patients are clinically stable, and with opportunities for iteration as the clinical situation unfolds.

objectivesTesting feasibility and acceptability in busy outpatient oncology clinics of a novel program of systematic, oncology nurse-led values discussions with all new cancer patients.

methodsWithin an institutional initiative integrating primary and specialist palliative care from diagnosis for all cancer patients, oncology nurses were trained to use specific questions and an empathic communication framework to discuss health-related values during outpatient clinic visits. Nurses summarized discussions on a template for patient verification, oncologist review, and electronic medical record documentation. Summaries were reviewed with the patient at least quarterly. Feasibility and acceptability were evaluated in three clinics for patients with hematologic or gastrointestinal malignancies.

resultsOncology nurses conducted 177 total discussions with 67 newly diagnosed cancer patients (17 with hematologic and 50 with gastrointestinal malignancies) over two years. No patient declined participation. Discussions averaged eight minutes, and all patients verified values summaries. Clinic patient volume was maintained. Of 31 patients surveyed, 30 (97%) reported feeling comfortable with the process, considered it helpful, and would recommend it to others. Clinicians strongly endorsed the values discussion process.

conclusionNurse-led discussions of patient values soon after diagnosis are feasible and acceptable in busy oncology clinics. Further research will evaluate the impact of this novel approach on additional patient-oriented outcomes after broader dissemination of this initiative throughout our institution.

Indexed as

Advance Care PlanningClinical Decision-MakingNeoplasmsPalliative CarePatient ParticipationPatient PreferenceCommunicationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedAdvance care planningcancercommunicationnursingpatient participation

Identifiers

PMID31034869
PMCPMC6849206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.