Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31034480›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Spodoptera frugiperda Smith (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Cameroon: Case study on its distribution, damage, pesticide use, genetic differentiation and host plants.

Apollin Fotso Kuate, Rachid Hanna, Armand R P Doumtsop Fotio, Albert Fomumbod Abang, Samuel Nanga Nanga, Sergine Ngatat, Maurice Tindo, Cargele Masso, Rose Ndemah, Christopher Suh and 1 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 110 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Toward Sustainable Management ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Apollin Fotso KuateInternational Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), Yaoundé, Cameroon.ORCID 0000-0002-5247-7519
Rachid HannaInternational Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), Yaoundé, Cameroon.
Armand R P Doumtsop FotioUniversity of Maroua, Faculty of Science, Maroua, Cameroon.
Albert Fomumbod AbangInternational Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), Yaoundé, Cameroon.ORCID 0000-0002-2791-9557
Samuel Nanga NangaInternational Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), Yaoundé, Cameroon.
Sergine NgatatInternational Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), Yaoundé, Cameroon.
Maurice TindoUniversity of Douala, Faculty of Science, Douala, Cameroon.
Cargele MassoInternational Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), Yaoundé, Cameroon.
Rose NdemahInternational Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), Yaoundé, Cameroon.
Christopher SuhInstitute of Agricultural Research for Development (IRAD), Yaoundé, Cameroon.
Komi Kouma Mokpokpo FiaboeInternational Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), Yaoundé, Cameroon.
International Institute of Tropical Agriculture · CMInstitut de Recherche Agricole pour le Développement · CMUniversity of Douala · CMUniversity of Maroua · CM

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Maize farmers in sub-Saharan Africa recently experienced unusual damage in their farms, attributed to the fall armyworm (FAW) Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith). This pest was first recorded in Africa in 2016, but detailed information on its distribution and damage and farmer's response in invaded areas are largely lacking. In this study, we determined FAW distribution, genetic diversity, host plants, crop damage, and farmers' responses. S. frugiperda was recorded in the 10 regions of Cameroon. Average percentage of infested plants and damage severity (on a scale of 1 to 5) were lowest-20.7 ± 7.4% and 2.1 ± 0.1 respectively-in the Sahelian regions and greatest-69.0 ± 4.3% and 3.1 ± 0.1 respectively-in the Western Highlands. Altitude did not influence FAW incidence and severity and its larvae infrequently co-occurred with maize stemborers on the same plants, suggesting possible direct and/or indirect competition between the two groups of maize pests. In response to this new threat to maize production, farmers have opted for the application of synthetic pesticides. Although our experiments were not designed to determine pesticide efficacy, as parameters such as time since application were not considered, our observations suggest lack of a drastic effect on S. frugiperda infestations on maize. There were two haplotypes of FAW co-occurring in Cameroon corresponding to the rice and corn strains and separated by 1.7% sequence divergence, which does not support the existence of cryptic species. S. frugiperda larvae were also recorded on Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench (10.6%), Solanum tuberosum L. (2.8%), Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam. (1.9%), Saccharum officinarum L (0.8%), Phaseolus vulgaris L. (0.4%) and Gossypium hirsutum L. (1.9%). This study show that two strains are present in all agroecological zones in Cameroon, and probably in neighboring countries of central Africa sharing the same agroecologies. Management options should therefore consider the use of specific natural enemies and an informed decision of intervention based on strain capture and damage threshold, to avoid pesticide resistance that may arise from inadequate use of chemicals. Further studies should also be undertaken to assess the response of the two S. frugiperda strains to biopesticides and botanical insecticides.

Indexed as

AnimalsCameroonGenome, InsectHost-Parasite InteractionsInsecticide ResistancePhylogenyPlant DiseasesSpodopteraZea mays

Identifiers

PMID31034480
PMCPMC6488053
OpenAlexW2943381834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.