Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31034476›Full record

SynthesisPLoS medicine2019

Extended prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism after hospitalization for medical illness: A trial sequential and cumulative meta-analysis.

Navkaranbir S Bajaj, Muthiah Vaduganathan, Arman Qamar, Kartik Gupta, Ankur Gupta, Harsh Golwala, Javed Butler, Samuel Z Goldhaber, Mandeep R Mehra

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PLoS medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Timing of venous thromboemboli in patients with acetabular and pelvic ring fractures.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Appropriateness of Pharmacologic Thromboprophylaxis Prescribing Based on Padua Score Among Inpatient Veterans.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. COVID-19 and coagulopathy.The clinical respiratory journal · 2021
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Navkaranbir S BajajDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine and Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4605-0797
Muthiah VaduganathanBrigham and Women's Hospital Heart and Vascular Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Arman QamarBrigham and Women's Hospital Heart and Vascular Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Kartik GuptaDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine and Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-9476-9264
Ankur GuptaDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, UTSW Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, United States of America.
Harsh GolwalaBrigham and Women's Hospital Heart and Vascular Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Javed ButlerDepartment of Medicine, University of Mississippi, Jackson, Mississippi, United States of America.
Samuel Z GoldhaberBrigham and Women's Hospital Heart and Vascular Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Mandeep R MehraBrigham and Women's Hospital Heart and Vascular Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-8683-7044

Funding

The Harvard Clinical and Translational Science CenterUL1TR002541 · NCATS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI NADLER, LEE MARSHALL · 2018 to 2022
$93.0M
UAB Center for Clinical and Translational Science (CCTS)UL1TR001417 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI KIMBERLY, ROBERT P. · 2015 to 2018
$31.4M
TRAINING PROGRAM IN CARDIOVASCULAR RESEARCHT32HL007604 · NHLBI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI MARK W FEINBERG · 1985 to 2026
$19.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001417NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002541NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007604
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe efficacy, safety, and clinical importance of extended-duration thromboprophylaxis (EDT) for prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in medical patients remain unclear. We compared the efficacy and safety of EDT in patients hospitalized for medical illness. METHODS AND

findingsElectronic databases of PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from inception to March 21, 2019. We included randomized clinical trials (RCTs) reporting use of EDT for prevention of VTE. We performed trial sequential and cumulative meta-analyses to evaluate EDT effects on the primary efficacy endpoint of symptomatic VTE or VTE-related death, International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) major or fatal bleeding, and all-cause mortality. The pooled number needed to treat (NNT) to prevent one symptomatic or fatal VTE event and the number needed to harm (NNH) to cause one major or fatal bleeding event were calculated. Across 5 RCTs with 40,247 patients (mean age: 67-77 years, proportion of women: 48%-54%, most common reason for admission: heart failure), the duration of EDT ranged from 24-47 days. EDT reduced symptomatic VTE or VTE-related death compared with standard of care (0.8% versus 1.2%; risk ratio [RR]: 0.61, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.44-0.83; p = 0.002). EDT increased risk of ISTH major or fatal bleeding (0.6% versus 0.3%; RR: 2.04, 95% CI: 1.42-2.91; p < 0.001) in both meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses. Pooled NNT to prevent one symptomatic VTE or VTE-related death was 250 (95% CI: 167-500), whereas NNH to cause one major or fatal bleeding event was 333 (95% CI: 200-1,000). Limitations of the study include variation in enrollment criteria, individual therapies, duration of EDT, and VTE detection protocols across included trials.

conclusionsIn this systematic review and meta-analysis of 5 randomized trials, we observed that use of a post-hospital discharge EDT strategy for a 4-to-6-week period reduced symptomatic or fatal VTE events at the expense of increased risk of major or fatal bleeding. Further investigations are still required to define the risks and benefits in discrete medically ill cohorts, evaluate cost-effectiveness, and develop pathways for targeted implementation of this postdischarge EDT strategy.

trial registrationPROSPERO CRD42018109151.

Indexed as

HospitalizationAgedAnticoagulantsChemopreventionCohort StudiesDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleHumansMaleRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicVenous ThromboembolismAnticoagulants

Identifiers

PMID31034476
PMCPMC6488047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.