SynthesisPLoS medicine2019
Extended prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism after hospitalization for medical illness: A trial sequential and cumulative meta-analysis.
Synthesis in PLoS medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Standard- versus extended-duration anticoagulation for primary venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in acutely ill medical patients.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Guideline
- Rivaroxaban for extended thromboprophylaxis in acutely ill medical patients 75 years of age or older.Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH · 2021Trial
- A comprehensive analysis of the effects of rivaroxaban on stroke or transient ischaemic attack in patients with heart failure, coronary artery disease, and sinus rhythm: the COMMANDER HF trial.European heart journal · 2019Trial
- Extended thrombotic prophylaxis in COVID-19 early discharge: A retrospective cohort study.PloS one · 2026Article
- Anticoagulation and other risk factors for clinically relevant bleeding after medical hospitalization: the Medical Inpatient Thrombosis and Hemostasis Study.Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH · 2025Article
- Same-day emergency care: a retrospective observational study of the incidence and predictors of venous thromboembolism following hospital-based acute ambulatory medical care.Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH · 2025Observational
- Timing of venous thromboemboli in patients with acetabular and pelvic ring fractures.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2024Article
- Methods of a cluster-randomized, type II hybrid implementation effectiveness trial to prospectively assess extended-duration thromboprophylaxis for at-risk medical patients being discharged to prevent hospital-associated venous thromboembolism.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2024Article
- High-risk subgroups were not identified to benefit from thromboprophylaxis after hospitalization for COVID-19.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2024Article
- Universal EHRs Clinical Decision Support for Thromboprophylaxis in Medical Inpatients: A Cluster Randomized Trial.JACC. Advances · 2023Article
- Deep vein thrombosis and validation of the Caprini risk assessment model in Chinese orthopaedic trauma patients: a multi-center retrospective cohort study enrolling 34,893 patients.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2023Article
- Racial differences in venous thromboembolism: A surveillance program in Durham County, North Carolina.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2022Article
- Appropriateness of Pharmacologic Thromboprophylaxis Prescribing Based on Padua Score Among Inpatient Veterans.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2022Article
- Rivaroxaban Plus Aspirin for Extended Thromboprophylaxis in Acutely Ill Medical Patients: Insights from the MARINER Trial.TH open : companion journal to thrombosis and haemostasis · 2022Article
- Challenges of extended venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in medical and surgical patients.Jornal vascular brasileiro · 2022Review
- Late-onset hematological complications post COVID-19: An emerging medical problem for the hematologist.American journal of hematology · 2022Review
- Associations Between Antithrombosis and Ventilator-Associated Events, ICU Stays, and Mortality Among Mechanically Ventilated Patients: A Registry-Based Cohort Study.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Article
- COVID-19 and coagulopathy.The clinical respiratory journal · 2021Review
- Post-discharge thrombosis and bleeding in medical patients: A novel risk score derived from ubiquitous biomarkers.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe efficacy, safety, and clinical importance of extended-duration thromboprophylaxis (EDT) for prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in medical patients remain unclear. We compared the efficacy and safety of EDT in patients hospitalized for medical illness. METHODS AND
findingsElectronic databases of PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from inception to March 21, 2019. We included randomized clinical trials (RCTs) reporting use of EDT for prevention of VTE. We performed trial sequential and cumulative meta-analyses to evaluate EDT effects on the primary efficacy endpoint of symptomatic VTE or VTE-related death, International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) major or fatal bleeding, and all-cause mortality. The pooled number needed to treat (NNT) to prevent one symptomatic or fatal VTE event and the number needed to harm (NNH) to cause one major or fatal bleeding event were calculated. Across 5 RCTs with 40,247 patients (mean age: 67-77 years, proportion of women: 48%-54%, most common reason for admission: heart failure), the duration of EDT ranged from 24-47 days. EDT reduced symptomatic VTE or VTE-related death compared with standard of care (0.8% versus 1.2%; risk ratio [RR]: 0.61, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.44-0.83; p = 0.002). EDT increased risk of ISTH major or fatal bleeding (0.6% versus 0.3%; RR: 2.04, 95% CI: 1.42-2.91; p < 0.001) in both meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses. Pooled NNT to prevent one symptomatic VTE or VTE-related death was 250 (95% CI: 167-500), whereas NNH to cause one major or fatal bleeding event was 333 (95% CI: 200-1,000). Limitations of the study include variation in enrollment criteria, individual therapies, duration of EDT, and VTE detection protocols across included trials.
conclusionsIn this systematic review and meta-analysis of 5 randomized trials, we observed that use of a post-hospital discharge EDT strategy for a 4-to-6-week period reduced symptomatic or fatal VTE events at the expense of increased risk of major or fatal bleeding. Further investigations are still required to define the risks and benefits in discrete medically ill cohorts, evaluate cost-effectiveness, and develop pathways for targeted implementation of this postdischarge EDT strategy.
trial registrationPROSPERO CRD42018109151.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.