Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31034467›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2019

Genetics of adaptation in modern chicken.

Saber Qanbari, Carl-Johan Rubin, Khurram Maqbool, Steffen Weigend, Annett Weigend, Johannes Geibel, Susanne Kerje, Christine Wurmser, Andrew Townsend Peterson, I Lehr Brisbin and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed
16.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed, 168 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Saber QanbariAnimal Breeding and Genetics Group, Department of Animal Sciences, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6866-2332
Carl-Johan RubinScience for Life Laboratory, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Microbiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Khurram MaqboolDepartment of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-2981-2582
Steffen WeigendFriedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Neustadt, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5670-2808
Annett WeigendFriedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Neustadt, Germany.
Johannes GeibelAnimal Breeding and Genetics Group, Department of Animal Sciences, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7172-3263
Susanne KerjeScience for Life Laboratory, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Microbiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Christine WurmserChair of Animal Breeding, Technical University Munich, Freising, Germany.
Andrew Townsend PetersonBiodiversity Institute, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-0243-2379
I Lehr BrisbinSavannah River Ecology Laboratory, Odum School of Ecology, University of Georgia, Aiken, South Carolina, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7561-4512
Ruedi PreisingerLohmann Tierzucht GmbH, Cuxhaven, Germany.
Ruedi FriesChair of Animal Breeding, Technical University Munich, Freising, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4657-1787
Henner SimianerAnimal Breeding and Genetics Group, Department of Animal Sciences, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Leif AnderssonScience for Life Laboratory, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Microbiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Uppsala University · SEFriedrich-Loeffler-Institut · DEUniversity of Göttingen · DEAgricultural Research & Education Organization · IRLohmann Tierzucht (Germany) · DESwedish University of Agricultural Sciences · SEUniversity of Georgia · USUniversity of Kansas · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We carried out whole genome resequencing of 127 chicken including red jungle fowl and multiple populations of commercial broilers and layers to perform a systematic screening of adaptive changes in modern chicken (Gallus gallus domesticus). We uncovered >21 million high quality SNPs of which 34% are newly detected variants. This panel comprises >115,000 predicted amino-acid altering substitutions as well as 1,100 SNPs predicted to be stop-gain or -loss, several of which reach high frequencies. Signatures of selection were investigated both through analyses of fixation and differentiation to reveal selective sweeps that may have had prominent roles during domestication and breed development. Contrasting wild and domestic chicken we confirmed selection at the BCO2 and TSHR loci and identified 34 putative sweeps co-localized with ALX1, KITLG, EPGR, IGF1, DLK1, JPT2, CRAMP1, and GLI3, among others. Analysis of enrichment between groups of wild vs. commercials and broilers vs. layers revealed a further panel of candidate genes including CORIN, SKIV2L2 implicated in pigmentation and LEPR, MEGF10 and SPEF2, suggestive of production-oriented selection. SNPs with marked allele frequency differences between wild and domestic chicken showed a highly significant deficiency in the proportion of amino-acid altering mutations (P<2.5×10-6). The results contribute to the understanding of major genetic changes that took place during the evolution of modern chickens and in poultry breeding.

Indexed as

Adaptation, BiologicalGenomeGenomicsAllelesAnimalsChickensComputational BiologyGene FrequencyGenetic VariationMolecular Sequence AnnotationPolymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Identifiers

PMID31034467
PMCPMC6508745
OpenAlexW2943004552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.