ArticleIEEE/ACM transactions on computational biology and bioinformatics
Schema Matching and Data Integration with Consistent Naming on Protein Crystallization Screens.
Article in IEEE/ACM transactions on computational biology and bioinformatics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The data representation as well as naming conventions used in commercial screen files by different companies make the automated analysis of crystallization experiments difficult and time-consuming. In order to reduce the human effort required to deal with this problem, we present an approach for computationally matching elements of two schemas using linguistic schema matching methods and then transform the input screen format to another format with naming defined by the user. This approach is tested on a number of commercial screens from different companies and the results of the experiments showed an overall accuracy of 97 percent on schema matching which is significantly better than the other two matchers we tested. Our tool enables mapping a screen file in one format to another format preferred by the expert using their preferred chemical names.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.