Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31034004›Full record

Trial reportJAMA pediatrics2019

Evaluation of the Diagnostic Stability of the Early Autism Spectrum Disorder Phenotype in the General Population Starting at 12 Months.

Karen Pierce, Vahid H Gazestani, Elizabeth Bacon, Cynthia Carter Barnes, Debra Cha, Srinivasa Nalabolu, Linda Lopez, Adrienne Moore, Sunny Pence-Stophaeros, Eric Courchesne

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA pediatrics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 177 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
177citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
22.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

177 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 332 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Building Capacity: A Systematic Review of Training in the Diagnosis of Autism for Community-Based Clinicians.Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Who, when, where, and why: A systematic review of "late diagnosis" in autism.Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research · 2025
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Overall prognosis of preschool autism spectrum disorder diagnoses.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  7. Atypical structural connectivity of language networks in autism spectrum disorder: A meta-analysis of diffusion tensor imaging studies.Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research · 2022
    Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

117 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Karen PierceDepartment of Neurosciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla.
Vahid H GazestaniDepartment of Neurosciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla.
Elizabeth BaconDepartment of Neurosciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla.
Cynthia Carter BarnesDepartment of Neurosciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla.
Debra ChaDepartment of Neurosciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla.
Srinivasa NalaboluDepartment of Neurosciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla.
Linda LopezDepartment of Neurosciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla.
Adrienne MooreDepartment of Neurosciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla.
Sunny Pence-StophaerosDepartment of Neurosciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla.
Eric CourchesneDepartment of Neurosciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla.
University of California, San Diego · US

Funding

TARGETING GENETIC PATHWAYS FOR BRAIN OVERGROWTH IN AUTISM SPECTRUM DISORDERSP50MH081755 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI COURCHESNE, ERIC · 2007 to 2013
$10.3M
Detection of ASD at the 1st birthday as standard of care: The Get SET Early ModelR01MH104446 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI PIERCE, KAREN L · 2014 to 2018
$6.0M
INVESTIGATON OF COGNITIVE DYSFUNCTION IN AUTISMR01MH036840 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI COURCHESNE, ERIC · 1985 to 2011
$5.9M
Developmental Functional Genomics in ASD ToddlersR01MH110558 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI COURCHESNE, ERIC, LEWIS, NATHAN ENOCH · 2016 to 2020
$3.0M
Discovering Neural Biomarkers of Language and Social Development in ASD ToddlersR01DC016385 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI COURCHESNE, ERIC, PIERCE, KAREN L · 2017 to 2021
$3.0M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC016385NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH081755NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH036840NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH104446NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH110558
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Universal early screening for autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in primary care is becoming increasingly common and is believed to be a pivotal step toward early treatment. However, the diagnostic stability of ASD in large cohorts from the general population, particularly in those younger than 18 months, is unknown. Changes in the phenotypic expression of ASD across early development compared with toddlers with other delays are also unknown. Objectives: To examine the diagnostic stability of ASD in a large cohort of toddlers starting at 12 months of age and to compare this stability with that of toddlers with other disorders, such as developmental delay. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this prospective cohort study performed from January 1, 2006, to December 31, 2018, a total of 2241 toddlers were referred from the general population through a universal screening program in primary care or community referral. Eligible toddlers received their first diagnostic evaluation between 12 and 36 months of age and had at least 1 subsequent evaluation. Exposures: Diagnosis was denoted after each evaluation visit as ASD, ASD features, language delay, developmental delay, other developmental issue, typical sibling of an ASD proband, or typical development. Main Outcomes and Measures: Diagnostic stability coefficients were calculated within 2-month age bands, and logistic regression models were used to explore the associations of sex, age, diagnosis at first visit, and interval between first and last diagnosis with stability. Toddlers with a non-ASD diagnosis at their first visit diagnosed with ASD at their last were designated as having late-identified ASD. Results: Among the 1269 toddlers included in the study (918 [72.3%] male; median age at first evaluation, 17.6 months [interquartile range, 14.0-24.4 months]; median age at final evaluation, 36.2 months [interquartile range, 33.4-40.9 months]), the overall diagnostic stability for ASD was 0.84 (95% CI, 0.80-0.87), which was higher than any other diagnostic group. Only 7 toddlers (1.8%) initially considered to have ASD transitioned into a final diagnosis of typical development. Diagnostic stability of ASD within the youngest age band (12-13 months) was lowest at 0.50 (95% CI, 0.32-0.69) but increased to 0.79 by 14 months and 0.83 by 16 months (age bands of 12 vs 14 and 16 months; odds ratio, 4.25; 95% CI, 1.59-11.74). A total of 105 toddlers (23.8%) were not designated as having ASD at their first visit but were identified at a later visit. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings suggest that an ASD diagnosis becomes stable starting at 14 months of age and overall is more stable than other diagnostic categories, including language or developmental delay. After a toddler is identified as having ASD, there may be a low chance that he or she will test within typical levels at 3 years of age. This finding opens the opportunity to test the impact of very early-age treatment of ASD.

Indexed as

PhenotypeAutism Spectrum DisorderChild, PreschoolDevelopmental DisabilitiesEarly DiagnosisFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansInfantLogistic ModelsMaleMass ScreeningPrimary Health CareProspective StudiesPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesReferral and Consultation

Identifiers

PMID31034004
PMCPMC6547081
OpenAlexW2941892929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.