Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31033822›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery2019

Dipyridamole Augments Three-Dimensionally Printed Bioactive Ceramic Scaffolds to Regenerate Craniofacial Bone.

Christopher D Lopez, J Rodrigo Diaz-Siso, Lukasz Witek, Jonathan M Bekisz, Luiz F Gil, Bruce N Cronstein, Roberto L Flores, Andrea Torroni, Eduardo D Rodriguez, Paulo G Coelho

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Applications of DNA Hydrogels in Osteoporotic Bone Defects.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Employing Indirect Adenosine 2Journal of functional biomaterials · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christopher D LopezFrom the Hansjörg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery and the Division of Translational Medicine, Department of Medicine, New York University Langone Health; the Department of Biomaterials and Biomimetics at New York University College of Dentistry; the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai; the New York University School of Medicine; and the Department of Dentistry, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina.
J Rodrigo Diaz-SisoFrom the Hansjörg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery and the Division of Translational Medicine, Department of Medicine, New York University Langone Health; the Department of Biomaterials and Biomimetics at New York University College of Dentistry; the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai; the New York University School of Medicine; and the Department of Dentistry, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina.
Lukasz WitekFrom the Hansjörg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery and the Division of Translational Medicine, Department of Medicine, New York University Langone Health; the Department of Biomaterials and Biomimetics at New York University College of Dentistry; the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai; the New York University School of Medicine; and the Department of Dentistry, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina.
Jonathan M BekiszFrom the Hansjörg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery and the Division of Translational Medicine, Department of Medicine, New York University Langone Health; the Department of Biomaterials and Biomimetics at New York University College of Dentistry; the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai; the New York University School of Medicine; and the Department of Dentistry, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina.
Luiz F GilFrom the Hansjörg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery and the Division of Translational Medicine, Department of Medicine, New York University Langone Health; the Department of Biomaterials and Biomimetics at New York University College of Dentistry; the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai; the New York University School of Medicine; and the Department of Dentistry, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina.
Bruce N CronsteinFrom the Hansjörg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery and the Division of Translational Medicine, Department of Medicine, New York University Langone Health; the Department of Biomaterials and Biomimetics at New York University College of Dentistry; the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai; the New York University School of Medicine; and the Department of Dentistry, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina.
Roberto L FloresFrom the Hansjörg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery and the Division of Translational Medicine, Department of Medicine, New York University Langone Health; the Department of Biomaterials and Biomimetics at New York University College of Dentistry; the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai; the New York University School of Medicine; and the Department of Dentistry, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina.
Andrea TorroniFrom the Hansjörg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery and the Division of Translational Medicine, Department of Medicine, New York University Langone Health; the Department of Biomaterials and Biomimetics at New York University College of Dentistry; the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai; the New York University School of Medicine; and the Department of Dentistry, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina.
Eduardo D RodriguezFrom the Hansjörg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery and the Division of Translational Medicine, Department of Medicine, New York University Langone Health; the Department of Biomaterials and Biomimetics at New York University College of Dentistry; the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai; the New York University School of Medicine; and the Department of Dentistry, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina.
Paulo G CoelhoFrom the Hansjörg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery and the Division of Translational Medicine, Department of Medicine, New York University Langone Health; the Department of Biomaterials and Biomimetics at New York University College of Dentistry; the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai; the New York University School of Medicine; and the Department of Dentistry, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina.
New York University · US

Funding

Project-005UL1TR001445 · NCATS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI BREDELLA, MIRIAM ANTOINETTE, HOCHMAN, JUDITH S · 2015 to 2025
$103.5M
Institutional Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR000038 · NCATS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI CRONSTEIN, BRUCE NEIL · 2012 to 2014
$16.8M
Purinergic Stimulation of Bone RegenerationR01AR068593 · NIAMS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI COELHO, PAULO G, CRONSTEIN, BRUCE NEIL · 2015 to 2019
$2.8M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000038NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001445NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR068593
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAutologous bone grafts remain a standard of care for the reconstruction of large bony defects, but limitations persist. The authors explored the bone regenerative capacity of customized, three-dimensionally printed bioactive ceramic scaffolds with dipyridamole, an adenosine A2A receptor indirect agonist known to enhance bone formation.

methodsCritical-size bony defects (10-mm height, 10-mm length, full-thickness) were created at the mandibular rami of rabbits (n = 15). Defects were replaced by a custom-to-defect, three-dimensionally printed bioactive ceramic scaffold composed of β-tricalcium phosphate. Scaffolds were uncoated (control), collagen-coated, or immersed in 100 μM dipyridamole. At 8 weeks, animals were euthanized and the rami retrieved. Bone growth was assessed exclusively within scaffold pores, and evaluated by micro-computed tomography/advanced reconstruction software. Micro-computed tomographic quantification was calculated. Nondecalcified histology was performed. A general linear mixed model was performed to compare group means and 95 percent confidence intervals.

resultsQualitative analysis did not show an inflammatory response. The control and collagen groups (12.3 ± 8.3 percent and 6.9 ± 8.3 percent bone occupancy of free space, respectively) had less bone growth, whereas the most bone growth was in the dipyridamole group (26.9 ± 10.7 percent); the difference was statistically significant (dipyridamole versus control, p < 0.03; dipyridamole versus collagen, p < 0.01 ). There was significantly more residual scaffold material for the collagen group relative to the dipyridamole group (p < 0.015), whereas the control group presented intermediate values (nonsignificant relative to both collagen and dipyridamole). Highly cellular and vascularized intramembranous-like bone healing was observed in all groups.

conclusionDipyridamole significantly increased the three-dimensionally printed bioactive ceramic scaffold's ability to regenerate bone in a thin bone defect environment.

Indexed as

Adenosine A2 Receptor AgonistsAnimalsBone RegenerationCeramicsCollagenDipyridamoleDisease Models, AnimalHumansMandibleMandibular InjuriesMandibular ReconstructionPrinting, Three-DimensionalRabbitsTissue ScaffoldsTreatment OutcomeX-Ray MicrotomographyAdenosine A2 Receptor AgonistsCollagenDipyridamole

Identifiers

PMID31033822
PMCPMC6620113
OpenAlexW2942560800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.