ArticlePain2019
Modulation of brain networks by sumatriptan-naproxen in the inflammatory soup migraine model.
Article in Pain, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Where do we stand on fMRI in awake mice?Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2024Pooled it
- Inhibition of the METTL3/mThe journal of headache and pain · 2025Article
- Electroacupuncture at Fengchi(GB20) and Yanglingquan(GB34) Ameliorates Paralgesia through Microglia-Mediated Neuroinflammation in a Rat Model of Migraine.Brain sciences · 2023Article
- OnabotulinumtoxinA effects on trigeminal nociceptors.Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache · 2023Article
- Estradiol Treatment Enhances Behavioral and Molecular Changes Induced by Repetitive Trigeminal Activation in a Rat Model of Migraine.Biomedicines · 2022Article
- Review
- Applications in Awake Animal Magnetic Resonance Imaging.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Review
- Determining 5HTFrontiers in neuroscience · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Migraine is a debilitating condition; however, the pharmacological effects on central nervous system networks after successful therapy are poorly understood. Defining this neurocircuitry is critical to our understanding of the disorder and for the development of antimigraine drugs. Using an established inflammatory soup model of migraine-like pathophysiology (N = 12) compared with sham synthetic interstitial fluid migraine induction (N = 12), our aim was to evaluate changes in network-level functional connectivity after sumatriptan-naproxen infusion in awake, conscious rodents (Sprague-Dawley rats). Sumatriptan-naproxen infusion functional magnetic resonance imaging data were analyzed using an independent component analysis approach. Whole-brain analysis yielded significant between-group (inflammatory soup vs synthetic interstitial fluid) alterations in functional connectivity across the cerebellar, default mode, basal ganglia, autonomic, and salience networks. These results demonstrate the large-scale antimigraine effects of sumatriptan-naproxen co-administration after dural sensitization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.