Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31033443›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2019

Smartphone-Based Meditation for Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Patients: Feasibility Study to Inform Future Trials.

Jennifer Huberty, Ryan Eckert, Linda Larkey, Jonathan Kurka, Sue A Rodríguez De Jesús, Wonsuk Yoo, Ruben Mesa

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 44 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03726944 nacompletednot on this map

Feasibility of Using a Consumer-based Mobile App to Improve Fatigue and Emotional Symptoms in Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorArizona State UniversityRan2017 to 2018Enrolled128ConditionsMyeloproliferative NeoplasmArmsCalm App Meditation, Unnamed Consumer-Based App Meditation, Educational Control
NCT05027113 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

App-Based Mindfulness Meditation for People of Color Who Experience Race-Related Stress: A Randomized Control Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, Los AngelesRan2021 to 2022Enrolled155ConditionsStress, Psychological, Anxiety, Depression, RuminationArmsMindfulness meditation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Feasibility and preliminary effects of mhealth supportive care interventions in adults with myeloid neoplasms: a systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Mindfulness-based interventions for addressing sexual function after cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. A shot in the dark: the impact of online visibility on the search for an effective sleep app.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2024
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jennifer HubertyCollege of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0276-4640
Ryan EckertMays Cancer Center, University of Texas Health MD Anderson, San Antonio, TX, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9105-5354
Linda LarkeyCollege of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7681-6813
Jonathan KurkaCollege of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9086-9564
Sue A Rodríguez De JesúsCollege of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1710-3167
Wonsuk YooCollege of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2414-2399
Ruben MesaMays Cancer Center, University of Texas Health MD Anderson, San Antonio, TX, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5880-7972

Funding

TISSUE CULTURE---COREP30CA054174 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI Robin Jean Leach · 1991 to 2026
$59.1M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA054174
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMyeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) patients often report high symptom burden that persists despite the best available pharmacologic therapy. Meditation has gained popularity in recent decades as a way to manage cancer patient symptoms.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to examine the feasibility of 2 different consumer-based meditation smartphone apps in MPN patients and to examine the limited efficacy of smartphone-based meditation on symptoms compared with an educational control group.

methodsPatients (n=128) were recruited nationally through organizational partners and social media. Eligible and consented patients were enrolled into 1 of 4 groups, 2 of which received varying orders of 2 consumer-based apps (10% Happier and Calm) and 2 that received one of the apps alone for the second 4 weeks of the 8-week intervention after an educational control condition. Participants were asked to perform 10 min of meditation per day irrespective of the app and the order in which they received the apps. Feasibility outcomes were measured at weeks 5 and 9 with a Web-based survey. Feasibility outcomes were acceptability, demand, and limited efficacy for depression, anxiety, pain intensity, sleep disturbance, sexual function, quality of life, global health, and total symptom burden.

resultsA total of 128 patients were enrolled across all 4 groups, with 73.4% (94/128) patients completing the intervention. Of the participants who completed the 10% Happier app, 61% (46/76) enjoyed it, 66% (50/76) were satisfied with the content, and 77% (59/76) would recommend to others. Of those who completed the Calm app, 83% (56/68) enjoyed it, 84% (57/68) were satisfied with the content, and 97% (66/68) would recommend to others. Of those who completed the educational control, 91% (56/61) read it, 87% (53/61) enjoyed it, and 71% (43/61) learned something. Participants who completed the 10% Happier app averaged 31 (SD 33) min/week; patients completing the Calm app averaged 71 (SD 74) min/week. 10% Happier app participants saw small effects on anxiety (P<.001 d=-0.43), depression (P=.02; d=-0.38), sleep disturbance (P=.01; d=-0.40), total symptom burden (P=.13; d=-0.27), and fatigue (P=.06; d=-0.30), and moderate effects on physical health (P<.001; d=0.52). Calm app participants saw small effects on anxiety (P=.29; d=-0.22), depression (P=.09; d=-0.29), sleep disturbance (P=.002; d=-0.47), physical health (P=.005; d=0.44), total symptom burden (P=.13; d=-0.27), and fatigue (P=.13; d=-0.27). Educational control participants (n=61) did not have effects on any patient-reported outcome except for a moderate effect on physical health (P<.001; d=0.77).

conclusionsDelivering meditation via the Calm app is feasible and scored higher in terms of feasibility when compared with the 10% Happier app. The Calm app will be used to implement a randomized controlled trial, testing the effects of meditation on symptom burden in MPNs.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03726944; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03726944 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/77MVdFJwM).

Indexed as

cancermeditationmHealthmindfulnessquality of lifesmartphone

Identifiers

PMID31033443
PMCPMC6658299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.