Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31032966›Full record

ArticleAlimentary pharmacology & therapeutics2019

Targets to improve quality of care for patients with hepatic encephalopathy: data from a multi-centre cohort.

Jasmohan S Bajaj, Jacqueline G O'Leary, Puneeta Tandon, Florence Wong, Patrick S Kamath, Scott W Biggins, Guadalupe Garcia-Tsao, Jennifer Lai, Michael B Fallon, Paul J Thuluvath and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [Guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of liver failure (2024 version)].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2025
    Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Reducing the Risk of Overt Hepatic Encephalopathy Recurrence: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical and translational hepatology · 2026
    Review
  5. Standardization of the Cirrhosis Admission Process and Its Impact on Inpatient Management and Patient Outcomes.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2026
    Article
  6. Management of Refractory Hepatic Encephalopathy.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Admission Serum Metabolites and Thyroxine Predict Advanced Hepatic Encephalopathy in a Multicenter Inpatient Cirrhosis Cohort.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2023
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. The Future of Quality Improvement for Cirrhosis.Liver transplantation : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society · 2021
    Review
  20. The Use of Rifaximin in Patients With Cirrhosis.Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.) · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Jasmohan S BajajRichmond, Virginia.ORCID 0000-0003-4928-3681
Jacqueline G O'LearyDallas, Texas.
Puneeta TandonEdmonton, AB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0486-0174
Florence WongToronto, ON, Canada.
Patrick S KamathRochester, Minnesota.
Scott W BigginsSeattle, Washington.
Guadalupe Garcia-TsaoWest Haven, Connecticut.ORCID 0000-0001-8371-4524
Jennifer LaiSan Francisco, California.
Michael B FallonPhoenix, Arizona.
Paul J ThuluvathBaltimore, Maryland.
Hugo E VargasScottsdale, Arizona.
Benedict MaliakkalMemphis, Tennessee.
Ram M SubramanianAtlanta, Georgia.
Leroy R ThackerRichmond, Virginia.
K Rajender ReddyPhiladelphia, Pennsylvania.
University of Richmond · USMemphis Health Center · USPhiladelphia University · USPhoenix (United States) · USSeattle University · USUniversity of Baltimore · USUniversity of Minnesota Rochester · US

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Research Supplement to Promote Diversity in Health Related ResearchUL1TR002649 · NCATS · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI MOELLER, FREDERICK GERARD · 2018 to 2022
$19.1M
Modulation of Gut-Brain Axis Using Fecal Microbiome Transplant Capsules in CirrhosisR21TR002024 · NCATS · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI BAJAJ, JASMOHAN S · 2017 to 2018
$414k
MR Brain Diffusion Tensor Imaging in SchizophreniaI01CX000176 · VA · VA BOSTON HEALTH CARE SYSTEM · PI SHENTON, MARTHA E. · 2009 to 2019
–
Fecal Microbiota Transplant in Veterans with CirrhosisI01CX001076 · VA · VA VETERANS ADMINISTRATION HOSPITAL · PI BAJAJ, JASMOHAN S · 2015 to 2024
–
CSRD VA I01 CX000176CSRD VA I01 CX001076Grifols PharmaceuticalsNCATS NIH HHS R21 TR002024NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002649Valeant Pharmaceuticals International
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHepatic encephalopathy (HE) can adversely affect outcomes in both in-patients and out-patients with cirrhosis.

aimTo define targets for improving quality of care in HE management in the multi-centre North American Consortium for End-Stage Liver Disease (NACSELD) cohort.

methodNACSELD in-patient cohort was analysed for (a) medication-associated precipitants, (b) aspiration pneumonia development, (c) HE medication changes, and (d) 90-day HE recurrence/readmissions. Comparisons were made between patients on no-therapy, lactulose only, rifaximin only or both. Ninety-day HE-readmission analysis was adjusted for MELD score.

resultsTwo thousand eight hundred and ten patients (1102 no-therapy, 659 lactulose, 154 rifaximin, 859 both) were included. HE on admission, and HE rates during hospitalisation were highest in those on lactulose only or dual therapy compared to no-therapy or rifaximin only (P < 0.001). Medications were the most prevalent precipitants (32%; 21% lactulose over/underuse, 5% benzodiazepines, 4% opioids, 1% rifaximin underuse, 1% hypnotics). Patients with medication-associated precipitants had a better prognosis compared to other precipitants. A total of 23% (n = 217) reached grade 3/4 HE, of which 16% developed HE-related aspiration pneumonia. Two thousand four hundred and twenty patients were discharged alive without liver transplant (790 no-therapy, 639 lactulose, 136 rifaximin, 855 both); 12.5% (n = 99) of no-therapy patients did not receive a discharge HE therapy renewal. Ninety-day HE-related readmissions were seen in 16% of patients (9% no-therapy, 9% rifaximin only, lactulose only 18%, dual 21%, <0.001), which persisted despite MELD adjustment (P = 0.009).

conclusionSeveral targets to improve HE management were identified in a large cohort of hospitalised cirrhotic patients. Interventions to decrease medication-precipitated HE, prevention of aspiration pneumonia, and optimisation of HE medications are warranted.

Indexed as

AgedCohort StudiesDrug Therapy, CombinationEnd Stage Liver DiseaseFemaleGastrointestinal AgentsHepatic EncephalopathyHumansLactuloseLiver CirrhosisMaleMiddle AgedQuality of Health CareRecurrenceRifaximinGastrointestinal AgentsLactuloseRifaximin

Identifiers

PMID31032966
PMCPMC6538445
OpenAlexW2943140621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.