ArticleDatabase : the journal of biological databases and curation2019
An effective biomedical document classification scheme in support of biocuration: addressing class imbalance.
Article in Database : the journal of biological databases and curation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Leveraging generative AI for clinical evidence synthesis needs to ensure trustworthiness.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2024Article
- Leveraging Generative AI for Clinical Evidence Synthesis Needs to Ensure Trustworthiness.ArXiv · 2024Article
- MetaTron: advancing biomedical annotation empowering relation annotation and collaboration.BMC bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Automatic identification of scientific publications describing digital reconstructions of neural morphology.Brain informatics · 2023Article
- Automatic identification of scientific publications describing digital reconstructions of neural morphology.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Unsupervised document classification integrating web scraping, one-class SVM and LDA topic modelling.Journal of applied statistics · 2023Article
- Hagit Shatkay-Reshef 1965-2022.Bioinformatics advances · 2022Article
- Pearson Correlation-Based Feature Selection for Document Classification Using Balanced Training.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Metabolomics and Multi-Omics Integration: A Survey of Computational Methods and Resources.Metabolites · 2020Review
- Integrating image caption information into biomedical document classification in support of biocuration.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2020Article
- Text mining meets community curation: a newly designed curation platform to improve author experience and participation at WormBase.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2020Article
- UPCLASS: a deep learning-based classifier for UniProtKB entry publications.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2020Article
- PGxMine: Text mining for curation of PharmGKB.Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Published literature is an important source of knowledge supporting biomedical research. Given the large and increasing number of publications, automated document classification plays an important role in biomedical research. Effective biomedical document classifiers are especially needed for bio-databases, in which the information stems from many thousands of biomedical publications that curators must read in detail and annotate. In addition, biomedical document classification often amounts to identifying a small subset of relevant publications within a much larger collection of available documents. As such, addressing class imbalance is essential to a practical classifier. We present here an effective classification scheme for automatically identifying papers among a large pool of biomedical publications that contain information relevant to a specific topic, which the curators are interested in annotating. The proposed scheme is based on a meta-classification framework using cluster-based under-sampling combined with named-entity recognition and statistical feature selection strategies. We examined the performance of our method over a large imbalanced data set that was originally manually curated by the Jackson Laboratory's Gene Expression Database (GXD). The set consists of more than 90 000 PubMed abstracts, of which about 13 000 documents are labeled as relevant to GXD while the others are not relevant. Our results, 0.72 precision, 0.80 recall and 0.75 f-measure, demonstrate that our proposed classification scheme effectively categorizes such a large data set in the face of data imbalance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.