Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31032706›Full record

ArticlePlant signaling & behavior2019

Misleading conclusions from exogenous ABA application: a cautionary tale about the evolution of stomatal responses to changes in leaf water status.

Amanda A Cardoso, Scott A M McAdam

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant signaling & behavior, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Petal stomata ofFrontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  4. Stomata: custodians of leaf gaseous exchange.Journal of experimental botany · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Signaling mechanisms in abscisic acid-mediated stomatal closure.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2021
    Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Amanda A Cardosoa Purdue Center for Plant Biology, Department of Botany and Plant Pathology , Purdue University , West Lafayette , IN , USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7078-6246
Scott A M McAdama Purdue Center for Plant Biology, Department of Botany and Plant Pathology , Purdue University , West Lafayette , IN , USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9625-6750
Purdue University West Lafayette · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stomatal responses to changes in leaf water status are critical for minimizing excessive water loss during soil drought. A major debate has surrounded the evolution of stomatal responses to water status and this debate has particularly focused on the evolution of the regulatory role of the drought hormone abscisic acid (ABA). Studies relying on the application of high levels of exogenous ABA have occasionally concluded that all stomata respond to ABA and that stomatal regulation in response to this hormone has not evolved over the past 450 million years. In contrast, studies which have investigated stomatal function in intact plants, as well as the role of endogenous ABA in regulating stomatal aperture, have found major evolutionary transitions in the functional regulation of stomata across land plant lineages. We show that endogenous ABA plays no role in closing the stomata of the fern

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionAbscisic AcidDroughtsFernsPlant StomataStress, PhysiologicalWaterAbscisic AcidWaterABA signalingdrought stressfloating epidermisleaf gas exchangeleaf hydraulicsstomatal evolution and behavior

Identifiers

PMID31032706
PMCPMC6619974
OpenAlexW2940846719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.