Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31032460›Full record

ArticleContemporary clinical trials communications2019

Impact of financial reimbursement on retention rates in military clinical trial research: A natural experiment within a multi-site randomized effectiveness trial with active duty service members.

Laura A Novak, Bradley E Belsher, Michael C Freed, Phoebe K McCutchan, Xian Liu, Daniel P Evatt, Terri Tanielian, Robert M Bray, Charles C Engel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary clinical trials communications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Strategies to improve retention in randomised trials.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Laura A NovakPsychological Health Center of Excellence (formerly Deployment Health Clinical Center), Research and Development Directorate, Defense Health Agency, 7700 Arlington Blvd, Suite 5101, Box #22 (Silver Spring Office), Falls Church, VA, 22041, USA.
Bradley E BelsherPsychological Health Center of Excellence (formerly Deployment Health Clinical Center), Research and Development Directorate, Defense Health Agency, 7700 Arlington Blvd, Suite 5101, Box #22 (Silver Spring Office), Falls Church, VA, 22041, USA.
Michael C FreedUniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, 4301 Jones Bridge Road, Bethesda, MD, 20814, USA.
Phoebe K McCutchanAmerican University, 4400 Massachusetts Ave NW, Washington, DC, 20016, USA.
Xian LiuPsychological Health Center of Excellence (formerly Deployment Health Clinical Center), Research and Development Directorate, Defense Health Agency, 7700 Arlington Blvd, Suite 5101, Box #22 (Silver Spring Office), Falls Church, VA, 22041, USA.
Daniel P EvattPsychological Health Center of Excellence (formerly Deployment Health Clinical Center), Research and Development Directorate, Defense Health Agency, 7700 Arlington Blvd, Suite 5101, Box #22 (Silver Spring Office), Falls Church, VA, 22041, USA.
Terri TanielianRAND Corporation, 1200 South Hayes Street, Arlington, VA, 22202, USA.
Robert M BrayRTI International (Retired), 3040 East Cornwallis Road, Post Office Box 12194, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709, USA.
Charles C EngelRAND Corporation, 20 Park Plaza, Suite 920, Boston, MA, 02116, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAchieving adequate retention rates in clinical trials is essential to ensuring meaningful results. Although financial reimbursement is an effective strategy to increase participant retention, current policies restrict the use of federal funds to reimburse U.S. active duty Service members for research participation. It is unknown whether permitting financial reimbursement among this population would improve trial retention rates. A recent randomized effectiveness trial received approval to provide reimbursement to Service member participants several months after recruitment began, creating a natural experiment to study the effects of financial reimbursement on retention. MATERIALS AND

methodsActive duty Service members recruited from six U.S. military treatment facilities (N = 666) were enrolled in a collaborative care study and completed assessments at baseline, three-, six-, and 12-months. Data on study assessment completion rates at three- and six-months were analyzed using the mixed-effects binary logit model to determine the probabilities of completing assessments based on reimbursement status.

resultsParticipants who received reimbursement were significantly more likely to complete study assessments at both time-points than participants who did not receive reimbursement (

conclusionResults suggest that providing Service members with reimbursement for research participation is associated with modest increases in retention rates in clinical trials. Findings provide useful insight for researchers, funding agencies, and policy-makers in considering retention strategies to maximize the value and impact of military research.

Indexed as

Clinical trialCompensationMilitaryRecruitmentRetention

Identifiers

PMID31032460
PMCPMC6477623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.