ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature2019
Clinical and procedural predictors of suboptimal myocardial reperfusion in primary percutaneous coronary intervention.
Article in International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- The role and mechanisms of microvascular damage in the ischemic myocardium.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2023Review
- A Narrative Review of the Classical and Modern Diagnostic Methods of the No-Reflow Phenomenon.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Clinical, Laboratory, and Procedural Predictors of No-Reflow in Patients Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.The journal of Tehran Heart Center · 2020Article
- No-reflow phenomenon in acute myocardial infarction: RelieveInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSuboptimal myocardial perfusion in primary PCI is associated with increased infarct size, left ventricular (LV) dysfunction and higher mortality rates as compared as those with optimal myocardial perfusion. We identified clinical and procedural predictors of suboptimal myocardial reperfusion as judged by myocardial plush grade (MBG) in primary PCI. METHODS AND
results100 patients with acute STEMI who underwent primary PCI were prospectively subjected to clinical, ECG, laboratory and angiographic evaluation. Patients were classified into: Optimal myocardial reperfusion group: (n=73) who had final MBG=3. Suboptimal myocardial reperfusion group: (n=27) who had persistent final MBG ≤ 2. Suboptimal myocardial reperfusion group had statistically significant little history of angina prior to MI 5 (18.5%) vs 44 (60.3%), little current aspirin intake 6(22%) vs 38 (52% ), increased blood sugar on admission (240 ± 101 mg/dl vs 171 ± 72 mg/dl), increased total leucocytic count on admission (12.1 ± 3.6 vs 10.2 ± 3.3) 103/mm3, longer reperfusion time (6.1 ± 2.8 vs 4.3 ± 2.1 h ), higher thrombus burden 12 (44.4 % ) vs 13 (17.8 %), higher predilatation pressure (16 ± 2.3 vs 14 ± 1.8 ATM), repeated balloon inflation during predilatation 24 (92.3 % ) vs 46 (69.7%) as compared optimal myocardial reperfusion group, (P < 0.05 for all).
conclusionLonger reperfusion time, repeated balloon inflations, high predilatation pressure> 15 ATM , high thrombus burden, neither history of angina nor aspirin intake prior to AMI, high total leucocytic count > 10103/mm3 and high blood glucose level > 160mg/dl were predictors for persistent suboptimal myocardial reperfusion in primary PCI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.