Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31032370›Full record

ArticleBioMed research international2019

Carbapenem-Resistant

Yi Li, Hui Shen, Cheng Zhu, Yuetian Yu

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioMed research international, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Evolution of ceftazidime-avibactam resistance driven by variation inFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Phage-antibiotic combinations againstFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yi LiDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, 450003, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5849-6040
Hui ShenDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200123, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7456-5536
Cheng ZhuDepartment of Emergency, Ruijin Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200005, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0846-6740
Yuetian YuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200001, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0193-4046
Shanghai Jiao Tong University · CNHenan Provincial People's Hospital · CNShanghai East Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate the prevalence of infections due to carbapenem-resistant

methodsFive hundred and seven consecutive ICU admission patients with

resultsOf the total 507 isolates of KP, 244 (48.1%) strains were carbapenem resistant. The majority of these isolates were from sputum (30.9%) and blood (20.9%) samples. Tigecycline had good activity against CRKP (95.5%). The most common sequence type (ST) of CRKP was ST11 (84.4%), and 98.6% of them had the

conclusionsST11 carrying the

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, BacterialCarbapenemsChinaFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsKlebsiella InfectionsKlebsiella pneumoniaeMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMiddle AgedRisk FactorsCarbapenems

Identifiers

PMID31032370
PMCPMC6457282
OpenAlexW2923196795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.