Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31032221›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oncology2019

Basket Trials for Intractable Cancer.

Bao-Dong Qin, Xiao-Dong Jiao, Ke Liu, Ying Wu, Xi He, Jun Liu, Wen-Xing Qin, Zhan Wang, Yuan-Sheng Zang

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Oncogenic gene fusions in cancer: from biology to therapy.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bao-Dong QinDepartment of Medical Oncology, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Xiao-Dong JiaoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Ke LiuDepartment of Medical Oncology, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Ying WuDepartment of Medical Oncology, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Xi HeDepartment of Medical Oncology, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Jun LiuDepartment of Medical Oncology, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Wen-Xing QinDepartment of Medical Oncology, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Zhan WangDepartment of Medical Oncology, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Yuan-Sheng ZangDepartment of Medical Oncology, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Shanghai Changzheng Hospital · CNSecond Military Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Currently, genomic characterization has become standard of care for tumor types such as non-small cell lung cancer, breast cancer, melanoma, and colorectal cancer. A deep understanding of genomic alterations in different tumor types would help identify potentially actionable genomic changes which occur across a wide variety of tumor types. A basket trial is a new type of clinical trial for which eligibility is based on the presence of a specific genomic alteration, irrespective of histology. Basket trials are phase II screening trials for the off-label use of a targeted drug in patients with the same genomic alterations for which it was approved. Intractable cancer refers to a type or condition of cancer which is unresponsive or resistant to treatment; intractable cancers may be classified into five subtypes as follows: hard-to-treat condition of common advanced cancer after multiple-line therapy, rare cancer in which no standard of care has been recommended, advanced cancer in which standard of care does not work well, cancer accompanied with organ dysfunction, and cancers in older or younger cancer patients. Previous studies have demonstrated that in basket trials, genomic-guided therapy yields clinical benefits in intractable cancer, thereby providing novel insights into the optimal clinical management of such cancers. In this review, we describe a novel way to classify intractable cancer, and summarize the current knowledge on such cancers. We additionally provide information on the role of basket trials in intractable cancer.

Indexed as

basket trialgenome-driven oncologyintractable cancermolecular alterationpersonalized precision therapyrefractory cancer

Identifiers

PMID31032221
PMCPMC6473081
OpenAlexW2937543111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.