ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2019
Reproducibility and non-redundancy of radiomic features extracted from arterial phase CT scans in hepatocellular carcinoma patients: impact of tumor segmentation variability.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
47 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Research progress of MRI-based radiomics in hepatocellular carcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Impact of inter-reader contouring variability on textural radiomics of colorectal liver metastases.European radiology experimental · 2020Trial
- Development and internal validation of a clinicopathological and CT radiomics based prediction model for extracranial distant metastasis after radical resection in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Repeatability of diffusion and perfusion MRI derived radiomic features in glioblastoma: a test-retest study.Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2025Article
- Post-processing steps improve generalisability and robustness of an MRI-based radiogenomic model for human papillomavirus status prediction in oropharyngeal cancer.European radiology · 2025Article
- Cross-Software Radiomic Feature Robustness Assessed by Hierarchical Clustering and Composite Index Analysis: A Multi-Cancer Study on Colorectal and Liver Lesions.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Gradient-Based Radiomics for Outcome Prediction and Decision-Making in PULSAR: A Preliminary Study.International journal of particle therapy · 2025Article
- Myocardial perfusion SPECT radiomic features reproducibility assessment: Impact of image reconstruction and harmonization.Medical physics · 2025Article
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging Liver Segmentation Protocol Enables More Consistent and Robust Annotations, Paving the Way for Advanced Computer-Assisted Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Radiomic analysis based on magnetic resonance imaging for the prediction of VEGF expression in hepatocellular carcinoma patients.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2024Article
- Assessment of Y-90 Radioembolization Treatment Response for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cases Using MRI Radiomics.Molecular imaging and radionuclide therapy · 2024Article
- Article
- Does consensus contour improve robustness and accuracy inEJNMMI physics · 2024Article
- Repeatability of computed tomography liver radiomic features in a nonhuman primate model of diet-induced steatosis.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2023Article
- Limited impact of discretization/interpolation parameters on the predictive power of CT radiomic features in a surgical cohort of pancreatic cancer patients.La Radiologia medica · 2023Article
- Performance of alternative manual and automated deep learning segmentation techniques for the prediction of benign and malignant lung nodules.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2023Article
- L-distance ratio: a new distance ratio-based evaluation method for the diagnosis of cirrhosis using enhanced computed tomography.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023Article
- Current status and future perspectives of radiomics in hepatocellular carcinoma.World journal of gastroenterology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe reproducibility and non-redundancy of radiomic features are challenges in accelerating the clinical translation of radiomics. In this study, we focused on the robustness and non-redundancy of radiomic features extracted from computed tomography (CT) scans in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with respect to different tumor segmentation methods.
methodsArterial enhanced CT images were retrospectively randomly obtained from 106 patients. As a training data set, 26 HCC patients were used to calculate the features' reproducibility and redundancy. Another data set (55 HCC patients and 25 healthy volunteers) was used for classification. The GrowCut and GraphCut semiautomatic segmentation methods were implemented in 3D Slicer software by two independent observers, and manual delineation was performed by five abdominal radiation oncologists to acquire the gross tumor volume (GTV). Seventy-one radiomic features were extracted from GTVs using Imaging Biomarker Explorer (IBEX) software, including 17 tumor intensity statistical features, 16 shape features and 38 textural features. For each radiomic feature, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and hierarchical clustering were used to quantify its reproducibility and redundancy. Features with ICC values greater than 0.75 were considered reproducible. To generate the number of non-redundancy feature subgroups, the R
resultsThe percentages of excellent reproducible features in the manual delineation group, GraphCut and GrowCut segmentation group were 69% [49], 73% [52] and 79% [56], respectively. Sixty-five percent [46] of the features showed strong robustness for all segmentation methods. The optimal number of cluster subgroup were 9, 13 and 11 for manual delineation, GraphCut and GrowCut segmentation, respectively. The optimal cluster subgroup number was 6 for all groups when the collectively high reproducibility features were selected for clustering. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis of radiomics classification model with and without feature reduction for healthy liver and HCC had an AUC value of 0.857 and 0.721 respectively.
conclusionsOur study demonstrates that variations exist in the reproducibility of quantitative imaging features extracted from tumor regions segmented using different methods. The reproducibility and non-redundancy of the radiomic features rely greatly on the tumor segmentation in HCC CT images. We recommend that the most reliable and uniform radiomic features should be selected in the clinical use of radiomics. Classification experiments with feature reduction showed that radiomic features were effective in identifying healthy liver and HCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.