Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31032191›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2019

Metabolic parameters with different thresholds for evaluating tumor recurrence and their correlations with hematological parameters in locally advanced squamous cell cervical carcinoma: an observational

Siyao Du, Hongzan Sun, Si Gao, Jun Xin, Zaiming Lu

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Predictive value of metabolic parameters derived from preoperativeQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Primary tumor standardized uptake value (SUVmax) measured onJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Siyao Du1Department of Radiology, 2Liaoning Provincial Key Laboratory of Medical Imaging, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, China.
Hongzan Sun1Department of Radiology, 2Liaoning Provincial Key Laboratory of Medical Imaging, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, China.
Si Gao1Department of Radiology, 2Liaoning Provincial Key Laboratory of Medical Imaging, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, China.
Jun Xin1Department of Radiology, 2Liaoning Provincial Key Laboratory of Medical Imaging, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, China.
Zaiming Lu1Department of Radiology, 2Liaoning Provincial Key Laboratory of Medical Imaging, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, China.
China Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPositron emission tomography (PET) parameters for a combination of the primary tumor and suspicious metastatic lymph nodes (SMLNs) appear to be more potential than those for the primary tumor alone for evaluating tumor recurrence in locally advanced cervical carcinoma (LACC), while the optimal threshold has not been determined. This study investigated the optimal PET parameters and percentage of SUV

methodsEighty-nine patients with advanced squamous cell cervical carcinoma (SCCC) scheduled for CCRT underwent pretreatment whole body PET/CT scans. We analyzed PET parameters including maximum standardized uptake value (SUV

resultsThe optimal threshold for evaluating tumor recurrence was 50%SUV

conclusionsThe MTV-C estimated by using a 50%SUV

Indexed as

Cervical squamous cell carcinomaconcurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT)positron emission tomography (PET)prognosis

Identifiers

PMID31032191
PMCPMC6462570
OpenAlexW2933278989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.