Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31032173›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of STEM education2019

Perceived supports and evidence-based teaching in college STEM.

Meghan E Bathgate, Oriana R Aragón, Andrew J Cavanagh, Jonathan K Waterhouse, Jennifer Frederick, Mark J Graham

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of STEM education, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Game design as a STEM pedagogy.Journal of microbiology & biology education · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Meghan E Bathgate1Poorvu Center for Teaching & Learning, Yale University, 301 York Street, New Haven, CT 06511 USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8003-3061
Oriana R Aragón1Poorvu Center for Teaching & Learning, Yale University, 301 York Street, New Haven, CT 06511 USA.
Andrew J Cavanagh1Poorvu Center for Teaching & Learning, Yale University, 301 York Street, New Haven, CT 06511 USA.
Jonathan K Waterhouse1Poorvu Center for Teaching & Learning, Yale University, 301 York Street, New Haven, CT 06511 USA.
Jennifer Frederick1Poorvu Center for Teaching & Learning, Yale University, 301 York Street, New Haven, CT 06511 USA.
Mark J Graham4Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, 165 Prospect St, New Haven, CT 06511 USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEvidence-based teaching, such as active learning, is associated with increases in student learning and engagement. Although many faculty are beginning to adopt innovative practices, traditional lecture-based teaching tends to dominate college science education. What are the factors associated with faculty's decision to incorporate evidence-based teaching? While there are known

resultsThese results come from a uniquely large dataset of college science faculty and instructors from across the USA (

conclusionFaculty's perceived supports, not perceived barriers, are most strongly related to their reported implementation of evidence-based teaching. These findings suggest relevant stakeholders devote increased attention identifying and building the factors that promote evidence-based teaching in addition to reducing what inhibits it.

Indexed as

College STEMEvidence-based teachingTeaching barriersTeaching supports

Identifiers

PMID31032173
PMCPMC6456468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.