ReviewJournal of advanced research2019
Carbon based nanomaterials for tissue engineering of bone: Building new bone on small black scaffolds: A review.
Review in Journal of advanced research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 101 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
101 citing papers in PubMed, 376 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Mechanistic advances in microbial nanobiotechnology and their applications in sustainable agriculture, environment and biomedicine.Discover nano · 2026Review
- 2D Boron Nanoplatelets as a Multifunctional Additive for Osteogenic, Gram-Negative Antimicrobial and Mechanically Reinforcing Bone Repair Scaffolds.Small science · 2025Article
- Carbon nanomaterials: Exploring new frontiers in wound healing therapy.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2025Review
- Tailoring bone microenvironment with 2D layered materials.Fundamental research · 2025Review
- Two-dimensional nanomaterials for bone disease therapy: multifunctional platforms for regeneration, anti-infection and tumor ablation.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2025Review
- Stimuli-responsive hybrid materials for 4DMaterials today. Bio · 2025Review
- Material properties and progress in modification of hydrogel-based self-expandable poly(methyl methacrylate) bone cement.RSC advances · 2025Review
- Biomedical Applications of Carbon-Based Nanomaterials: Exploring Recent Advances in Therapeutics, Diagnostics, and Tissue Engineering.Advanced pharmaceutical bulletin · 2025Review
- Biomaterial-Based Scaffolds as Carriers of Topical Antimicrobials for Bone Infection Prophylaxis.Polish journal of microbiology · 2025Review
- Nanomaterial-based scaffolds for bone regeneration with piezoelectric properties.Nanomedicine (London, England) · 2025Review
- [Applications and prospects of graphene and its derivatives in bone repair].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2025Review
- Nanoparticles in Bone Regeneration: A Narrative Review of Current Advances and Future Directions in Tissue Engineering.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2024Review
- Emerging Trends in Nanomedicine: Carbon-Based Nanomaterials for Healthcare.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Nanoengineered Silica-Based Biomaterials for Regenerative Medicine.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Microarchitected Compliant Scaffolds of Pyrolytic Carbon for 3D Muscle Cell Growth.Advanced healthcare materials · 2024Article
- Review
- The effect of graphene and graphene oxide induced reactive oxygen species on polycaprolactone scaffolds for bone cancer applications.Materials today. Bio · 2024Article
- Effects of mechanical properties of carbon-based nanocomposites on scaffolds for tissue engineering applications: a comprehensive review.Nanoscale advances · 2024Review
- Precise healing of oral and maxillofacial wounds: tissue engineering strategies and their associated mechanisms.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Review
41 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Tissue engineering is a rapidly-growing approach to replace and repair damaged and defective tissues in the human body. Every year, a large number of people require bone replacements for skeletal defects caused by accident or disease that cannot heal on their own. In the last decades, tissue engineering of bone has attracted much attention from biomedical scientists in academic and commercial laboratories. A vast range of biocompatible advanced materials has been used to form scaffolds upon which new bone can form. Carbon nanomaterial-based scaffolds are a key example, with the advantages of being biologically compatible, mechanically stable, and commercially available. They show remarkable ability to affect bone tissue regeneration, efficient cell proliferation and osteogenic differentiation. Basically, scaffolds are templates for growth, proliferation, regeneration, adhesion, and differentiation processes of bone stem cells that play a truly critical role in bone tissue engineering. The appropriate scaffold should supply a microenvironment for bone cells that is most similar to natural bone in the human body. A variety of carbon nanomaterials, such as graphene oxide (GO), carbon nanotubes (CNTs), fullerenes, carbon dots (CDs), nanodiamonds and their derivatives that are able to act as scaffolds for bone tissue engineering, are covered in this review. Broadly, the ability of the family of carbon nanomaterial-based scaffolds and their critical role in bone tissue engineering research are discussed. The significant stimulating effects on cell growth, low cytotoxicity, efficient nutrient delivery in the scaffold microenvironment, suitable functionalized chemical structures to facilitate cell-cell communication, and improvement in cell spreading are the main advantages of carbon nanomaterial-based scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.