Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31032116›Full record

ArticleJournal of nutrition and metabolism2019

An Assessment of the Validity of an Audio-Video Method of Food Journaling for Dietary Quantity and Quality.

Emily Jago, Alain P Gauthier, Ann Pegoraro, Sandra C Dorman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nutrition and metabolism, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emily JagoLaurentian University, Sudbury, Canada.
Alain P GauthierDirector Centre for Rural and Northern Health Research, Laurentian University, Sudbury, Canada.
Ann PegoraroSchool of Human Kinetics, Laurentian University, Sudbury, Canada.
Sandra C DormanDirector Centre for Research Occupational Safety and Health, Laurentian University, Sudbury, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5196-5847

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo validate an audio-video (AV) method of food journaling, in a free-living scenario, compared to direct, weighed food assessment. DESIGN AND

settingData were collected in a cafeteria. Meals, selected by participants ( VARIABLES MEASURED: Data from the AV method and from the weighed food diaries were transcribed and entered into a nutrition software analysis program (Nutribase Pro 10.0). Nutrient outputs were compared between the two methods including kilocalories, macronutrients, and selected micronutrients. ANALYSES: Using mean scores for each variable, Wilcoxon signed-rank test and Spearman's correlation coefficients were conducted. Interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated for absolute agreement between the two methods to assess interrater reliability.

resultsWith the exception of Vitamin E and total weight, nutrient values were highly correlated between methods and were statistically significant given alpha = 0.05, power = 0.95, and effect size of 0.70.

conclusionsThe AV method may be a meaningful alternative to diary recording in a free-living setting.

Identifiers

PMID31032116
PMCPMC6458870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.