ReviewJournal of thoracic disease2019
Enhancing the study of enhanced recovery after thoracic surgery: methodology and population-based approaches for the future.
Review in Journal of thoracic disease, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi-level analysis and evaluation of organizational improvements in thoracic surgery according to a Value-Based HealthCare approach.Journal of thoracic disease · 2023Article
- Commentary: Semper ad meliora: Continuous improvement in enhanced recovery pathways.JTCVS open · 2022Article
- Guide to Enhanced Recovery for Cancer Patients Undergoing Surgery.Annals of surgical oncology · 2021Article
- Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol Minimizes Intensive Care Unit Utilization and Improves Outcomes Following Pulmonary Resection.World journal of surgery · 2021Article
- Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERASJournal of thoracic disease · 2021Article
- Opioid Dependence After Lung Cancer Resection: Institutional Analysis of State Prescription Drug Database.World journal of surgery · 2021Article
- National survey of enhanced recovery after thoracic surgery practice in the United Kingdom and Ireland.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2020Article
- Hospital readmissions after pulmonary resection: post-discharge nursing telephone assessment identifies high risk patients.Journal of thoracic disease · 2020Article
- Is there a real need for a remotely actuated magnetic chest drain device?Journal of thoracic disease · 2019Article
- [Proper Selection of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Programs between the Medical Service and Medical Intervence - Is It Time to Do?]Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Achieving optimal outcomes following thoracic surgery requires a complex multidisciplinary effort spanning the entire peri-operative period. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols aim to codify essential elements in care across all perioperative settings. As thoracic surgeons have begun to embrace ERAS, identification of optimal protocol elements and novel study endpoints is necessary. In this review we will briefly review the current available evidence for ERAS in thoracic surgery, while focusing on study methods and design. We will discuss methodology for future studies and how a population-based approach can improve the current level of evidence supporting broad implementation of ERAS to thoracic surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.