Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31032041›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2019

Visual adaptation and microhabitat choice in Lake Victoria cichlid fish.

Daniel Mameri, Corina van Kammen, Ton G G Groothuis, Ole Seehausen, Martine E Maan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Daniel MameriCEF - Forest Research Centre, School of Agriculture, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-8942-3792
Corina van KammenGroningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences (GELIFES), University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Ton G G GroothuisGroningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences (GELIFES), University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0741-2174
Ole SeehausenDepartment of Fish Ecology and Evolution, Eawag Center for Ecology, Evolution and Biogeochemistry, Kastanienbaum, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-6598-1434
Martine E MaanGroningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences (GELIFES), University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1113-8067
University of Groningen · NLUniversity of Bern · CHUniversity of Lisbon · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When different genotypes choose different habitats to better match their phenotypes, genetic differentiation within a population may be promoted. Mating within those habitats may subsequently contribute to reproductive isolation. In cichlid fish, visual adaptation to alternative visual environments is hypothesized to contribute to speciation. Here, we investigated whether variation in visual sensitivity causes different visual habitat preferences, using two closely related cichlid species that occur at different but overlapping water depths in Lake Victoria and that differ in visual perception (

Indexed as

colour visionecological speciationhabitat choicehaplochrominesensory drive

Identifiers

PMID31032041
PMCPMC6458373
OpenAlexW2897217878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.