Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31032019›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2019

A ctenophore (comb jelly) employs vortex rebound dynamics and outperforms other gelatinous swimmers.

Brad J Gemmell, Sean P Colin, John H Costello, Kelly R Sutherland

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Brief History of Ctenophora.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Brad J GemmellDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33620, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9031-6591
Sean P ColinWhitman Center, Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, MA 02543, USA.
John H CostelloWhitman Center, Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, MA 02543, USA.
Kelly R SutherlandOregon Institute of Marine Biology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6832-6515

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gelatinous zooplankton exhibit a wide range of propulsive swimming modes. One of the most energetically efficient is the rowing behaviour exhibited by many species of schyphomedusae, which employ vortex interactions to achieve this result. Ctenophores (comb jellies) typically use a slow swimming, cilia-based mode of propulsion. However, species within the genus

Indexed as

bioengineeringbiomechanicsjellyfishplanktonpropulsionvortex interactions

Identifiers

PMID31032019
PMCPMC6458386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.